Accessibility settings

JMIR Medical Informatics

Clinical informatics, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, and eHealth infrastructures.

Editor-in-Chief:

Arriel Benis, PhD, FIAHSI, SMIEEE, MACE, Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA


Impact Factor 5.0 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 7.5 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Medical Informatics is an open-access journal that focuses on the challenges and impacts of clinical informatics, digitalization of care processes, and clinical and health data pipelines from acquisition to reuse, including semantics, natural language processing, natural interactions, meaningful analytics and decision support, electronic health records, infrastructures, implementation, and evaluation. The journal prioritizes research that bridges theoretical frameworks with actionable insights, ensuring that informatics solutions demonstrate measurable clinical or population impact (see Focus and Scope).

JMIR Medical Informatics adheres to rigorous quality standards, involving a rapid and thorough peer-review process, professional copyediting, and professional production of PDF, XHTML, and XML proofs.

The journal is indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, DOAJ, Scopus, and the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). 

JMIR Medical Informatics received a 2025 Impact Factor of 5.0, ranking Q2 in Medical Informatics (17/54).

JMIR Medical Informatics received a Scopus CiteScore of 7.5 (2025), placing it in the 78th percentile (37/168) as a first quartile (Q1) journal in the field of Health Informatics. 

Recent Articles

Doctor's hands on keyboard with computer screen showing cartoon character
Ambient AI Scribes and AI-Driven Documentation Technologies

Medical record quality is a key focus of health care quality management. Traditional manual medical record quality control (QC) suffers from low efficiency, inability to achieve full-sample coverage, and poor consistency. Existing intelligent QC systems have significant deficiencies in real-time intervention and quantitative assessment of application effects.

AI analyzing patient data for rehabilitation and improved healthcare outcomes
Natural Language Processing

The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is a standard functional assessment tool in rehabilitation medicine; however, formal assessments are often conducted only at limited intervals. Free-text clinical notes contain more frequent observations of patients’ functional status and may complement these assessments.

Doctor in white coat using a tablet, with stethoscope around neck.
Viewpoints on and Experiences with Digital Technologies in Health

Ambient AI scribes have been rapidly adopted across health care organizations to mitigate documentation burden and burnout. Initial single-system reports described substantial time savings, but more recent multisite evaluations and meta-analyses describe modest, heterogeneous effects with generally low methodological quality. Most evaluations emphasize efficiency and satisfaction, leaving potential effects on communication quality, narrative preservation, cognitive performance, and equity largely unmeasured. This viewpoint aimed to characterize evaluation patterns in prominent ambient AI scribe implementations, explain why unmeasured domains warrant investigation for patient safety and care quality, and propose an expanded framework with feasible research priorities. This analytic viewpoint mapped evaluation domain coverage in a purposive, illustrative sample of prominent implementation reports published through April 2026, then synthesized findings with literature on clinical communication, narrative medicine, automation effects, and health equity. Reporting was guided by Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) principles for narrative reviews; PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) was not used because the work is a domain-coverage characterization rather than an evidence synthesis estimating effects. A single reviewer (VSME) performed selection and extraction, consistent with the viewpoint’s illustrative intent. Across the included implementations, evaluation consistently measured documentation time, after-hours work, and clinician satisfaction. Within this illustrative sample of 6 independently peer-reviewed real-world implementation evaluations, we did not identify any that reported systematic assessment of patient-clinician communication using validated instruments, structured comparison of AI-generated against human-generated notes for narrative fidelity, longitudinal evaluation of cognitive or educational effects, or equity analyses stratified by language and demographic group. The absence in this purposive sample reflects an absence of public reporting rather than proof that no organization has measured these dimensions internally. Limited error analyses found frequent omissions, with accuracy declining as encounter complexity increased. Evidence from multilingual and interpreter-mediated encounters was notably sparse. Current evidence supports continued implementation with quality safeguards in settings where benefits are demonstrated locally rather than universal adoption on the strength of early single-system reports. Organizations implementing ambient AI scribes should consider embedding prospective evaluation across 4 domains: validated communication quality measurement, structured narrative content comparison, longitudinal cognitive and training studies, and equity analyses across languages and demographics. Three near-term priorities offer immediate feasibility for organizations with evaluation capacity: (1) deploying validated communication instruments such as the Communication Assessment Tool or Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (CAHPS) within ongoing rollouts; (2) launching multisite longitudinal trainee cohorts comparing programs with and without ambient AI exposure; and (3) oversampling multilingual and interpreter-mediated encounters for stratified equity analyses. Narrative preservation requires foundational methodological work before implementation-ready measures exist. Editors, implementers, and vendors can each act now: editors by requiring domain-coverage reporting; implementers by preregistering evaluation plans before rollout; vendors by publishing stratified performance data as a routine condition of deployment. The goal is to preserve documented efficiency gains while generating evidence about communication, narrative, reasoning, and equity dimensions that current evaluations leave unmeasured.

Dentist with glasses and mask checks phone with "CODE BLUE" alert while patient is on oxygen mask.
AI Language Models in Health Care

Publicly accessible, internet-based AI chatbots have emerged as unregulated digital health resources that clinicians and patients consult in real time, including during acute medical emergencies. In dental practice—where life-threatening events such as anaphylaxis, cardiac arrest, and severe hypoglycemia can unfold within seconds—the unsupervised use of these tools as point-of-care decision aids poses uncharacterized patient safety risks. Despite widespread deployment, no study has systematically evaluated the accuracy, temporal consistency, or multilingual reliability of contemporary large language model (LLM)–based chatbots specifically for dental medical emergency management.

Medical professionals in a meeting discussing ICD-10 and SNOMED-CT codes on a screen
Ontologies, Classifications, and Coding

With the rapid expansion of health care data, multiple international standardized terminology systems have been developed and refined to ensure semantic interoperability, which is a crucial factor in facilitating collaborative use.

Doctor using a tablet for medical diagnosis, with AI healthcare technology.
Machine Learning

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common, life-threatening complication among hospitalized patients. Timely prediction is crucial for prevention, while accurate prognosis following onset is essential for guiding care. Although electronic health records (EHRs) provide rich longitudinal data, their high dimensionality, heterogeneity, and temporal complexity pose challenges for traditional machine learning.

Man and woman collaborating on a computer screen displaying project management software
Implementation Report

Anxiety problems are prevalent among autistic children and adolescents and those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Natural language processing (NLP) is increasingly used to structure information from electronic health records (EHRs), but its implementation within secure child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) research environments is less frequently reported.

Diverse team collaborating on data analysis at a desk with charts on screen.
Information Models

Major adverse renal and cardiovascular events (MARCE) have been proposed as a comprehensive end point reflecting both cardiac and renal outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, existing prediction tools lack accuracy and generalizability for this high-risk population.

Doctor in white coat waves during a telemedicine consultation, writing notes.
Research Letter

In a cross-sectional analysis of traditional Medicare Fee-For-Service beneficiaries aged 66 years or older with outpatient oncology-related encounters, we found that telehealth modestly extended patient-provider geographic reach but largely operated within existing office-based catchments and preserved rural-urban distance gradients. Equitable telehealth policy should target patients with high travel burden while supporting digital access, navigation, and cross-jurisdiction continuity.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with