This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

AI Language Models in Health Care (61) Computer-Aided Diagnosis (135) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (325) Artificial Intelligence (1421) Scientometrics, Infometrics, and Altmetrics (95) New Resources for Medical Education (72)

Published on in Vol 12 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/63010, first published .
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Differential Diagnosis Lists Generated by Gemini Advanced, Gemini, and Bard for a Case Report Series Analysis: Cross-Sectional Study

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Differential Diagnosis Lists Generated by Gemini Advanced, Gemini, and Bard for a Case Report Series Analysis: Cross-Sectional Study

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Differential Diagnosis Lists Generated by Gemini Advanced, Gemini, and Bard for a Case Report Series Analysis: Cross-Sectional Study

Authors of this article:

Takanobu Hirosawa1 Author Orcid Image ;   Yukinori Harada1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kazuki Tokumasu2 Author Orcid Image ;   Takahiro Ito3 Author Orcid Image ;   Tomoharu Suzuki4 Author Orcid Image ;   Taro Shimizu1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Zhang J, Ma Y, Zhang R, Chen Y, Xu M, Rina S, Ma K. A comparative study of GPT-4o and human ophthalmologists in glaucoma diagnosis. Scientific Reports 2024;14(1) View