This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Tools, Programs and Algorithms (266) Digital Health Meta-Research and Bibliographic Studies (37) Information Seeking, Information Needs (465) Systematic Review Protocols (268)

Published on in Vol 10, No 5 (2022): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/33219, first published .
Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis

Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis

Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis

Authors of this article:

Kathryn Cowie1 Author Orcid Image ;   Asad Rahmatullah1 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicole Hardy1 Author Orcid Image ;   Karl Holub1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kevin Kallmes1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (53) Metrics

Journals

  1. Christopoulou S. Towards Automated Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials: An Overview. BioMedInformatics 2023;3(1):115 View
  2. Moyo P, Nunu W. Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Uptake and Acceptability Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Scoping Review of the Literature. American Journal of Men's Health 2023;17(5) View
  3. Plakkal N. How to Write a Systematic Review Without Meta-analysis. International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research 2023;10(2):119 View
  4. Singh S, Rajak R. Barriers in utilization and provisioning of obstetric care services (OCS) in India: a mixed-methods systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2024;24(1) View
  5. Boetje J, van de Schoot R. The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Systematic Reviews 2024;13(1) View
  6. Nso N, Mergen D, Ikram M, Macrinici V, Hussain K, Lee K, Ugwendum D, Trimingham M, Balasubramanian S, Sam R, Njei B. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in lean vs. non-lean MASLD: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Current Problems in Cardiology 2024;49(6):102569 View
  7. Gustavson A, Morrow C, Brown R, Kaka A, Sowerby C, Wilt T, Diem S. Reimagining How We Synthesize Information to Impact Clinical Care, Policy, and Research Priorities in Real Time: Examples and Lessons Learned from COVID-19. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2024;39(13):2554 View
  8. Tóth B, Berek L, Gulácsi L, Péntek M, Zrubka Z. Automation of systematic reviews of biomedical literature: a scoping review of studies indexed in PubMed. Systematic Reviews 2024;13(1) View
  9. Harmsen W, de Groot J, Harkema A, van Dusseldorp I, de Bruin J, van den Brand S, van de Schoot R. Machine learning to optimize literature screening in medical guideline development. Systematic Reviews 2024;13(1) View
  10. Bolaños F, Salatino A, Osborne F, Motta E. Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review 2024;57(10) View
  11. Affengruber L, van der Maten M, Spiero I, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Mahmić-Kaknjo M, Ellen M, Goossen K, Kantorova L, Hooft L, Riva N, Poulentzas G, Lalagkas P, Silva A, Sassano M, Sfetcu R, Marqués M, Friessova T, Baladia E, Pezzullo A, Martinez P, Gartlehner G, Spijker R. An exploration of available methods and tools to improve the efficiency of systematic review production: a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2024;24(1) View
  12. Mansilla C, Wang Q, Piggott T, Bragge P, Waddell K, Guyatt G, Sweetman A, Lavis J. A living critical interpretive synthesis to yield a framework on the production and dissemination of living evidence syntheses for decision-making. Implementation Science 2024;19(1) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Frestedt J. Planning, Writing and Reviewing Medical Device Clinical and Performance Evaluation Reports (CERs/ PERs). View