This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Decision Support for Health Professionals (772) Clinical Information and Decision Making (950)

Published on in Vol 7 , No 4 (2019) :Oct-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/14044, first published .
Differential Diagnosis Assessment in Ambulatory Care With an Automated Medical History–Taking Device: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Differential Diagnosis Assessment in Ambulatory Care With an Automated Medical History–Taking Device: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Differential Diagnosis Assessment in Ambulatory Care With an Automated Medical History–Taking Device: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Adrien Jean-Pierre Schwitzguebel 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Clarisse Jeckelmann 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Roberto Gavinio 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Cécile Levallois 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Charles Benaïm 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Hervé Spechbach 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Harada Y, Shimizu T. Impact of a Commercial Artificial Intelligence–Driven Patient Self-Assessment Solution on Waiting Times at General Internal Medicine Outpatient Departments: Retrospective Study. JMIR Medical Informatics 2020;8(8):e21056 View
  2. Harada Y, Katsukura S, Kawamura R, Shimizu T. Efficacy of Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Differential-Diagnosis List on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Physicians: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(4):2086 View
  3. Harada Y, Katsukura S, Kawamura R, Shimizu T. Effects of a Differential Diagnosis List of Artificial Intelligence on Differential Diagnoses by Physicians: An Exploratory Analysis of Data from a Randomized Controlled Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(11):5562 View
  4. Lee B, Lee T, Jeon H, Lee S, Kim K, Cho W, Hwang J, Chae Y, Jung J, Kang H, Kim N, Shin C, Jang J. Synergy Through Integration of Wearable EEG and Virtual Reality for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia Screening. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 2022;26(7):2909 View
  5. Bratland S, Baste V, Steen K, Diaz E, Bondevik G. Physician factors associated with medical errors in Norwegian primary care emergency services. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2021;39(4):429 View
  6. Kawamura R, Harada Y, Sugimoto S, Nagase Y, Katsukura S, Shimizu T. Incidence of Diagnostic Errors Among Unexpectedly Hospitalized Patients Using an Automated Medical History–Taking System With a Differential Diagnosis Generator: Retrospective Observational Study. JMIR Medical Informatics 2022;10(1):e35225 View
  7. Desai A, Anand S, Mathew S. Automated interactive patient history-taking system: A review. D Y Patil Journal of Health Sciences 2021;9(3):116 View
  8. Matsuoka A, Miike T, Yamazaki H, Higuchi M, Komaki M, Shinada K, Nakayama K, Sakurai R, Asahi M, Yoshitake K, Narumi S, Koba M, Sugioka T, Sakamoto Y, Pietrantonio F. Usefulness of a medical interview support application for residents: A pilot study. PLOS ONE 2022;17(9):e0274159 View
  9. Berdahl C, Henreid A, Pevnick J, Zheng K, Nuckols T. Digital Tools Designed to Obtain the History of Present Illness From Patients: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(11):e36074 View