This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Clinical Informatics in Low-Resource Settings and the Developing World (88) Clinical Informatics (919) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1340) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (198) Reviews in Medical Informatics (83) Electronic Health Records (971)

Published on in Vol 5, No 2 (2017): Apr-Jun

Computerized Childbirth Monitoring Tools for Health Care Providers Managing Labor: A Scoping Review

Computerized Childbirth Monitoring Tools for Health Care Providers Managing Labor: A Scoping Review

Computerized Childbirth Monitoring Tools for Health Care Providers Managing Labor: A Scoping Review

Authors of this article:

Michael S Balikuddembe1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nazarius M Tumwesigye4 Author Orcid Image ;   Peter K Wakholi5 Author Orcid Image ;   Thorkild Tylleskär1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Litwin L, Maly C, Khamis A, Hiner C, Zoungrana J, Mohamed K, Drake M, Machaku M, Njozi M, Muhsin S, Kulindwa Y, Gomez P. Use of an electronic Partograph: feasibility and acceptability study in Zanzibar, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2018;18(1) View
  2. Balikuddembe M, Tumwesigye N, Wakholi P, Tylleskär T. Expert perspectives on essential parameters to monitor during childbirth in low resource settings: a Delphi study in sub-Saharan Africa. Reproductive Health 2019;16(1) View
  3. Usmanova G, Gresh A, Cohen M, Kim Y, Srivastava A, Joshi C, Bhatt D, Haws R, Wadhwa R, Sridhar P, Bahl N, Gaikwad P, Anderson J. Acceptability and Barriers to Use of the ASMAN Provider-Facing Electronic Platform for Peripartum Care in Public Facilities in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, India: A Qualitative Study Using the Technology Acceptance Model-3. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(22):8333 View
  4. Mohaghegh Z, Jahanfar S, Abedi P, El Aziz M. Reliability of ultrasound versus digital vaginal examination in detecting cervical dilatation during labor: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review. The Ultrasound Journal 2021;13(1) View
  5. Cansdale L, Kelly G, Khashan A, Malata A, Kachale F, Lissauer D, Yosefe S, Roberts J, Woodworth S, Mmbaga B, Redman C, Hirst J. Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022;12(10):e063886 View
  6. Takpor T, Atayero A, Adetiba E, Badejo J. Development of a Low-Intensity Light Imaging Probe for Childbirth Cervical Dilation Image Acquisition. IEEE Access 2023;11:86149 View
  7. Lee H, Melbye E. Nursing home caregivers' acceptance of, and experiences with, a new digital intervention for oral healthcare: A qualitative feasibility study. Gerodontology 2024;41(1):68 View