This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Information Seeking, Information Needs (458) Artificial Intelligence (1329) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (818) Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1343)

Published on in Vol 9, No 1 (2021): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/24618, first published .
Development of Social Support Networks by Patients With Depression Through Online Health Communities: Social Network Analysis

Development of Social Support Networks by Patients With Depression Through Online Health Communities: Social Network Analysis

Development of Social Support Networks by Patients With Depression Through Online Health Communities: Social Network Analysis

Authors of this article:

Yingjie Lu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Shuwen Luo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Xuan Liu2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (12) Tweetations (1) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China

    2School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

    Corresponding Author:

    Xuan Liu, PhD

    School of Business

    East China University of Science and Technology

    Meilong Road 130

    Shanghai, 200237

    China

    Phone: 86 2164252489

    Email: xuanliu@ecust.edu.cn


    Background: In recent years, people with mental health problems are increasingly using online social networks to receive social support. For example, in online depression communities, patients can share their experiences, exchange valuable information, and receive emotional support to help them cope with their disease. Therefore, it is critical to understand how patients with depression develop online social support networks to exchange informational and emotional support.

    Objective: Our aim in this study was to investigate which user attributes have significant effects on the formation of informational and emotional support networks in online depression communities and to further examine whether there is an association between the two social networks.

    Methods: We used social network theory and constructed exponential random graph models to help understand the informational and emotional support networks in online depression communities. A total of 74,986 original posts were retrieved from 1077 members in an online depression community in China from April 2003 to September 2017 and the available data were extracted. An informational support network of 1077 participant nodes and 6557 arcs and an emotional support network of 1077 participant nodes and 6430 arcs were constructed to examine the endogenous (purely structural) effects and exogenous (actor-relation) effects on each support network separately, as well as the cross-network effects between the two networks.

    Results: We found significant effects of two important structural features, reciprocity and transitivity, on the formation of both the informational support network (r=3.6247, P<.001, and r=1.6232, P<.001, respectively) and the emotional support network (r=4.4111, P<.001, and r=0.0177, P<.001, respectively). The results also showed significant effects of some individual factors on the formation of the two networks. No significant effects of homophily were found for gender (r=0.0783, P=.20, and r=0.1122, P=.25, respectively) in the informational or emotional support networks. There was no tendency for users who had great influence (r=0.3253, P=.05) or wrote more posts (r=0.3896, P=.07) or newcomers (r=–0.0452, P=.66) to form informational support ties more easily. However, users who spent more time online (r=0.6680, P<.001) or provided more replies to other posts (r=0.5026, P<.001) were more likely to form informational support ties. Users who had a big influence (r=0.8325, P<.001), spent more time online (r=0.5839, P<.001), wrote more posts (r=2.4025, P<.001), or provided more replies to other posts (r=0.2259, P<.001) were more likely to form emotional support ties, and newcomers (r=–0.4224, P<.001) were less likely than old-timers to receive emotional support. In addition, we found that there was a significant entrainment effect (r=0.7834, P<.001) and a nonsignificant exchange effect (r=–0.2757, P=.32) between the two networks.

    Conclusions: This study makes several important theoretical contributions to the research on online depression communities and has important practical implications for the managers of online depression communities and the users involved in these communities.

    JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(1):e24618

    doi:10.2196/24618

    Keywords

    online depression community; social support network; exponential random graph model; informational support; emotional support; mental health; depression; social network 


    Background

    Mental health problems have received more and more attention in recent years. The number of patients with mental illnesses, such as depression and anxiety disorders, is increasing rapidly worldwide [1]. A World Health Organization survey estimated that approximately 300 million people in the world might have depression by the end of 2015 [2]. How to deal with depression effectively has become a hot issue. Some studies have shown that a cost-effective way to prevent and treat depression is to obtain more social support [3]. Depressed patients with larger social support networks are more likely to improve their conditions, while patients who lack social support will gradually fall into social isolation and experience a worsening of their condition [4]. Patients often seek social support from their family, friends, and community members, but many of them keep their mental illness a secret to avoid labeling and discrimination related to depression [5].

    In recent years, with the development of social networking sites, especially online health communities, patients increasingly use online resources to seek peer social support [6]. They can communicate with other patients online and develop their online social networks. On the one hand, the anonymity of online communities may make depressed patients feel more open when disclosing their illness to others [7,8]. They can more easily develop their social networks without fear of discrimination. On the other hand, peer social support in online communities is also important for patients to cope with their illness [9,10]. A survey about online depression communities showed that 41% of users thought that social support received from online communities was very helpful in treating their diseases [11].

    Social support from online health communities is generally divided into informational support and emotional support [12]. Peers can provide valuable treatment information and share their own experiences to help others deal with their illness. Meanwhile, peers can show compassion and empathy to one another, which is also important for helping depressed patients to improve their symptoms [13].

    Many studies have indicated that online informational and emotional support can provide huge benefits to patients with depression if they can develop these two types of social support networks. However, few researchers have studied what characteristics of patients make them more likely to develop the two types of network relationships and what patients can do to better develop these support networks. This study aimed to explore important structural features of the informational and emotional support networks and investigate which user attributes have significant effects on the formation of the two types of social network ties. The findings may help patients to better develop their social support networks to improve their conditions. In addition, although previous studies have found that both the informational support network and the emotional support network are beneficial to the improvement of mental health, few studies have examined whether there is a significant correlation between the two support networks. We wanted to find out if users could obtain more emotional support through the development of an online informational support network and vice versa. If users who are given informational support are more likely to obtain emotional support, they may be more willing to provide more information to develop their informational support network. Similarly, users may be more willing to develop an emotional support network in order to obtain more information support if the two supports align with one another. Therefore, another aim of this study was to examine whether there is an association between the informational support network and the emotional support network. The findings may help patients to better understand the relationship between the two support networks, which may help them better develop their social support networks to improve their conditions.

    Over the years, scholars have used some of the quantitative methods developed for social network analysis to better understand social networks in online communities. In particular, the use of exponential random graph models (ERGMs) is quickly becoming recognized as one of the central approaches in analyzing social networks [14]. ERGMs are tie-based models for understanding how and why social network ties arise. ERGMs can incorporate different types of network configurations and estimate their effects on network formation. For example, ERGMs can incorporate any number of binary, categorical, and continuous actor attributes to determine whether actor attributes are associated with the formation of network ties. As well, we could extend ERGMs to multivariate analysis of two networks and examine the cross-network effects [15]. ERGMs are concerned first and foremost with explaining the patterns of ties in a social network and thus provide a framework within which hypotheses about the impact of various factors on social tie formation can be statistically examined. Therefore, in this study, we applied ERGMs to social support networks in online depression communities in our attempt to investigate the following research questions (RQs):

    • RQ1: What are important structural features of the informational support network and the emotional support network in online depression communities? Which user attributes will affect the formation of the two types of social ties?
    • RQ2: Is there an association between the two social support networks?

    Theoretical Background and Research Hypotheses

    ERGMs are tie-based models for understanding how and why social network ties arise [14]. The models are based on some theoretical assumptions about social networks: network ties not only self-organize, but also are influenced by actor attributes and other exogenous factors. Therefore, in this study, we wanted to examine the formation of social network ties in online depression communities from the following aspects: network self-organization, individual attributes, and exogenous contextual factors.

    Network Self-Organization

    One particularly important feature of social networks is that network ties depend on one another, which is referred to as network self-organization. That is to say, the presence of one tie may affect the presence of other ties. We need to take account of purely structural tendencies for tie formation in the contexts of online depression communities. Two common parameters for purely structural effects were included in our study: reciprocity and transitivity.

    The reciprocity principle refers to the phenomenon that people like those who like them [16]. Reciprocity is seen as a basic and universal human behavior, and social ties are generally expected to be reciprocated in human social networks [17]. We thought that the reciprocity effect could occur in the context of online depression communities. On one hand, we expect social ties to be reciprocated in the informational support network. When patients communicate with peers with the same illness to share valuable information and experiences, they will expect the mutual reciprocity that justifies their expense in terms of time and effort spent contributing their knowledge. The users who receive valuable information from their peers are more likely to reciprocate the information providers with their knowledge. On the other hand, we expect social ties to be reciprocated in the emotional support network. When patients receive blessings and encouragement from other members, they will thank their peers and give back the blessings they receive. They will develop reciprocated ties to encourage each other to fight against the illness together. Based on the arguments above, we proposed the following hypotheses:

    • Hypothesis 1a: Patients in online health communities tend to provide informational support to each other based on the principle of reciprocity.
    • Hypothesis 1b: Patients in online health communities tend to provide emotional support to each other based on the principle of reciprocity.

    Transitivity is another important feature of most social networks and describes the tendency in a social network for the friend of a friend to become one’s friend [18]. In the context of online depression communities, when one user makes a post to present information, share ideas, or express emotions, other members will follow the post to engage in the discussions or exchanges. Therefore, it is very possible that the members participating in the discussion of the same topic will develop close friend relationships. Based on the arguments above, we proposed the following hypotheses:

    • Hypothesis 2a: Patients are more likely to form new informational support ties with those who share mutual friends based on the principle of transitivity.
    • Hypothesis 2b: Patients are more likely to form new emotional support ties with those who share mutual friends based on the principle of transitivity.
    Individual Attributes

    Individual attributes in social network theory play very important roles in the formation of social ties [19-21]. Studies have shown that some common demographics, such as gender, age, education, and income levels, affect the involvement of individuals in social activities [22]. In addition, some other individual factors such as motivations and attitudes toward others in their social networks also have an impact on their social tie formation. We use the term actor attribute effects to explore the association of some specific individual attributes with social ties.

    The homophily principle states that people are more likely to form social ties with others who share similar characteristics [23]. The literature on the phenomenon comes from social network studies that were conducted in some specific research fields. In this study, we proposed gender to be the most influential source of homophily. First, gender is the most extensively researched factor among demographic characteristics of patients with depression. In recent years, the literature on depression has reflected great interest in gender differences not only in depression symptoms but also in the perceived support [24-26]. It was found that there are significant gender differences both in the quality of perceived support and in the importance of support variables as predictors of depressive symptoms [27-29]. Second, users in online social networks often consider gender as an important factor in their interpersonal communication with other community members [30]. By contrast, most of the other personal demographic information (eg, age, race, and occupation) is not considered to be of great help in enhancing communication between users. Therefore, users will probably fill in their gender but leave the other demographic options unmarked when registering on the website because they are unwilling to risk their personal privacy. Therefore, it is perhaps reasonable that we only consider gender as the source of the homophily in this study.

    According to the existing theories research on gender differences in depression, we proposed that gender differences in psychological factors, such as coping style (emotion-focused coping or problem-focused coping), could play an important role in influencing patients’ motivation and behavior in online depression communities. In addition, it is widely recognized that there are significant gender differences in the perception and utilization of social support [31,32]. We have reasons to believe that informational support and emotional support from online communities may have different effects on male and female patients and members of the same gender are more likely to provide social support to one another. Based on the arguments above, we proposed the following hypotheses:

    • Hypothesis 3a: Patients of the same gender are more likely to form informational support ties.
    • Hypothesis 3b: Patients of the same gender are more likely to form emotional support ties.

    Social influence plays an important role in the formation of social networks. There have to be some influential people in social networks who have a disproportionate influence on others. Those influential users in online social networks could be identified based on centrality measures according to social network theory [33]. Users with high degree centrality scores can be characterized as being highly informed or well-connected individuals [34]. Social capital theory suggests that influential users might have more opportunities to influence the behavior of other users to accumulate social capital, such as being respected by other users. We have reasons to believe that in online depression communities, users who have great influence are more likely to get more social capital, including informational support and emotional support. In addition, the more that users are embedded in social networks, the more easily they will get social support. Online time is an important indicator of the degree of embedding in social networking networks. Users with more online time have more opportunities to participate in interactive activities on online platforms. They are well known by the members of the community, so it is easier for them to get social support. Based on the arguments above, we proposed the following hypotheses:

    • Hypothesis 4a: Users who have great influence are more likely to form informational support ties.
    • Hypothesis 4b: Users who have great influence are more likely to form emotional support ties.
    • Hypothesis 5a: Users with more online time are more likely to form informational support ties.
    • Hypothesis 5b: Users with more online time are more likely to form emotional support ties.

    Users’ social activities will have an important impact on the formation of their online social networks. According to the preferential attachment model—a widely accepted mechanism that accounts for tie formation in social networks—actors with a large number of existing ties are more likely to attract connections from other actors joining the network, thus showing the phenomenon that “the rich get richer” [35,36]. In online depression communities, users develop social relationships by participating in social activities including making and replying to others’ posts. Those users with high online activity levels generate a lot of posts and are considered to be core nodes in the social network, so they have more chances of getting more social support. A study based on online weight loss networks showed that active users received a high level of both informational and emotional support [37]. Based on the arguments above, we proposed the following hypotheses:

    • Hypothesis 6a: Users who write more posts are more likely to form informational support ties.
    • Hypothesis 6b: Users who write more posts are more likely to form emotional support ties.
    • Hypothesis 7a: Users who provide more replies to other posts are more likely to form informational support ties.
    • Hypothesis 7b: Users who provide more replies to other posts are more likely to form emotional support ties.

    In addition, some studies pointed out that newcomers who recently joined online health communities get more attention easily [38]. On the one hand, it is generally thought that newcomers lack the necessary knowledge, and thus they are more anxious to seek help and the emotional support of community members [39]. On the other hand, we believe that the experienced “old-timers” are more willing to share knowledge with newcomers and provide them with more support for a number of reasons [40-42]. First, some of them hope to develop new social ties with newcomers to enhance their social capital [43]. Second, community members with a high degree of shared identity and strong levels of trust consider it a duty to assist newcomers in improving depression treatment and outcomes and they hope that the newcomers soon became fully integrated into the online community [44,45]. Third, community members are more willing to share information and provide emotional support based on an altruistic motivation to provide help to newcomers who badly need it because altruism is more likely to occur when the recipient is in greater need or is more likely to profit from an altruistic act [46,47]. Based on the arguments above, we proposed the following hypotheses:

    • Hypothesis 8a: Newcomers are more likely to form informational support ties.
    • Hypothesis 8b: Newcomers are more likely to form emotional support ties.
    Exogenous Contextual Factors

    Some exogenous contextual factors may be important to tie formation. We often treat these as tie covariates [48]. For example, when there are multiple network ties, different types of networks may interact with each other and these interactions will affect the structure of each network. In this case, a certain social network, as an exogenous contextual factor, may be considered a tie covariate of another social network. In the context of online depression communities, there are mainly two social support networks: informational support networks and emotional support networks. We sought to determine whether there is an association between the two networks and if they are tie covariates of each other. That is, emotional support ties may be affected by the presence of informational support relations and vice versa.

    The most fundamental cross-network effects for directed networks are entrainment and exchange effects [49]. On one hand, we want to examine whether the two social support networks are entrained, so that users who obtain informational support are more likely to obtain emotional support. It is possible that many patients need both informational support and emotional support when they ask for help or, alternatively, that support providers are more inclined to provide emotional support to those network partners who need informational support. On the other hand, the two support networks may be exchanged, in which case those who receive informational support tend to give emotional support to those informational support providers. It is also reasonable for users to develop reciprocal relationships, and they will express appreciation and provide emotional support to those peers who have helped them. Based on the arguments above, we proposed the following hypotheses:

    • Hypothesis 9: The two social support networks may be entrained so that users who obtain informational support are more likely to obtain emotional support and vice versa.
    • Hypothesis 10: The two social support networks may be exchanged so that users who receive informational support are more likely to give emotional support to those informational support providers and vice versa.

    Research Context and Data Collection

    One of the most popular online health platforms for Chinese patients with depression was chosen as the data source. The online discussion forum was comprised of 15 discussion boards where patients could talk about a variety of topics related to depression. After over 10 years of development, the platform has attracted more than 10,000 registered users. The website is an open information exchange platform for patients with depression, where they can discuss their symptoms of depression, share their own treatment experiences, and seek useful medical information. In addition, the website provides an emotional communication channel for patients with depression, in which they can open their hearts to express their feelings and thoughts with their peers, such as expressing their emotional distress, showing sympathy, and encouraging one another. Therefore, the informational and emotional support networks developed in the online depression community have played a very important role in improving the condition of patients with depression.

    We used the Java WebCrawler script to collect the webpage information from the online depression community and then parsed the webpages to obtain available information. We obtained a total of 74,986 original posts and replies to the posts created by the users in the online community from April 2003 to September 2017. The available information about the posts was stored into a database, including the author’s ID, the post’s title and body content, and the time stamp. In addition, some user profile information available to the public was also stored, such as gender, online points, online duration, number of posts and replies written by the user, and registration time. It should be noted that some ambiguous or incomplete posts were present on the discussion boards. For example, some nonbinary individuals or patients who did not disclose their gender left the gender option unmarked. A total of 9452 ambiguous or incomplete posts were identified and excluded from the experimental data.

    Considering the potential risk to privacy and confidentiality, we only used the information that was available to the general public. No user identification data, such as names and ID numbers, was used to ensure that there was no risk of sensitive information disclosure. Therefore, our study had minimal risk to human subjects and followed core ethical principles. In addition, we took some measures to make sure that the users involved were fully informed about our study. First, an official notification elaborating on the research and how the user information would be used was sent by an internal email to users to confirm that it had been read. Second, to fulfill the ethical requirements, one page with a “click to accept” button was sent to the users through the messaging system on the platform, which allowed them to click the button to express their agreement to participate in our research.

    Some key variables related to user attributes were measured in our empirical analysis. The variable of “gender” was measured as a dummy variable, with 1=male and 0=female. We used the variable of “influence” to represent the online influence of the users, which was measured in terms of online points, indicating the contribution made by the member to the website. Some other variables that were used in our empirical analysis—online duration, and number of posts and replies of users—were measured in terms of time spent on the website, the number of original posts made by the user, and the number of replies to other posts written by the user. In addition, the variable of “newcomers” was measured as a dummy variable, with 1=users who were among the most recent 25% of individuals to join the website and 0=others.

    We further performed a content analysis of all the original posts and classified them into informational and emotional posts. We extracted some keywords related to the diagnosis and treatment of depression to construct an information dictionary and then used the dictionary-based method to distinguish informational posts. In the same way, we extracted some keywords indicating emotional support to construct an emotion dictionary and then used the dictionary-based method to distinguish emotional posts. For the list of keywords in the information and emotion dictionaries, see Multimedia Appendix 1. After controversial posts were deleted from the experimental data, an informational support network of 1077 nodes and 6557 arcs and an emotional support network of 1077 nodes and 6430 arcs were constructed (Figures 1 and 2, respectively). We can see that the emotional support network has a stronger core-periphery structure than the informational support network, indicating that users preferred to exchange information with other users in the forum, while they were more likely to derive emotional support from the broader population.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Informational support network.
    View this figure
    ‎
    Figure 2. Emotional support network.
    View this figure

    ERGMs

    ERGMs are a class of statistical models for social networks that account for the presence or absence of network ties [50-52]. ERGMs are particularly useful for overcoming the limitations of traditional regression methods, which are ill-suited for analyzing network data because ERGMs do not require the assumption of independence among the ties in a network. In addition, EGRMs have many advantages in social network analysis [53,54]. First, ERGMs can incorporate different types of local patterns of ties, which are also called “network configurations,” and estimate the effects of these network configurations on the formation of network ties. Second, ERGMs can accommodate any number of binary, categorical, or continuous actor attribute variable and dyad-specific covariates and determine whether they are associated with the formation of network ties. Third, ERGMs can also be used to analyze different types of networks with various types of nodes and relationships and can even model the two networks simultaneously. Therefore, ERGMs are novel and powerful tools for analyzing and explaining the patterns of network ties, especially in complex social networks [54].

    We used the notation and terminology described by Robins [14]. For each pair (i and j) of a set number of actors, Xij is a random variable that represents a tie between actor “i” and actor “j” (Xij=1 if there is a tie between actors i and j, and 0=no tie). These ties are represented in an n×n adjacency matrix (with n being the number of actors in the network), which is denoted as X. We specify xij as the observed value of Xij, and x denotes a matrix of observed ties in the network. ERGMs have the following general form:

    The A refers to a certain type of network configuration and is composed of a set of nodes and ties among them. The gA(x) represents network statistics corresponding to configuration A. For the ERGM used in this study, gA(x) is the number of configurations A observed in the network. The ηA coefficient is the parameter to be estimated corresponding to configuration A. The k is a normalizing constant to ensure a proper probability distribution.

    To better understand how to use ERGMs to test our hypothesis, we provide a graphical presentation of purely structural effects, actor-relation effects, and cross-network effects used in the model along with the corresponding research hypotheses (Figure 3).

    ‎
    Figure 3. Summary of network configurations included in the exponential random graph model.
    View this figure

    We estimated the ERGMs using Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation (MCMC-MLE) methods and implemented the simulation-based algorithms for MCMC-MLE in the statnet software suite developed for the R platform. The estimation procedure successfully converged for all parameters presented for the two social support network models.

    Table 1 presents the results of ERGM estimates for the informational support network, which shows the parameters for which there was a significant effect (ie, when the parameter estimate was greater than two times the standard error in absolute value). The results show that the estimates for the purely structural effects of reciprocity and transitivity were significant for the informational support network, indicating that patients in the online depression community tended to provide informational support to each other and were more likely to form new informational support ties if they shared mutual friends. Thus, hypotheses 1a and 2a were supported.

    Table 1. Exponential random graph model estimates for the informational support network.
    ParameterEstimateSEP valueHypothesisResult
    Purely structural effects

    		Reciprocity3.6247a0.1937<.001Hypothesis 1aSupported

    		Transitivity1.6232a0.0102<.001Hypothesis 2aSupported
    Actor-relation effects

    		Gender0.07830.0617.20Hypothesis 3aNot supported

    		Influence0.32530.1681.05Hypothesis 4aNot supported

    		Online duration0.6680a0.1562<.001Hypothesis 5aSupported

    		Number of posts0.38960.2132.07Hypothesis 6aNot supported

    		Number of replies0.5026a0.1505<.001Hypothesis 7aSupported

    		Newcomers–0.04520.1036.66Hypothesis 8aNot supported

    aSignificant effect.

    We then interpreted the ERGM results for the actor-relation effects in the informational support network. We found that there was no significant homophily effect for gender, indicating that there was no empirical evidence that patients of the same gender were more likely to form informational support ties. Thus, hypothesis 3a was not supported. In addition, the results showed that no significant effects for influence, number of posts, or newcomers were obtained, indicating that there was no tendency for users who had great influence or wrote more posts or were newcomers to form informational support ties more easily. Thus, hypotheses 4a, 6a, and 8a were not supported. However, we found significant effects for online duration and number of replies. This suggests that users who spend more time online or those who provide more replies to other posts are more likely to form informational support ties. Thus, hypotheses 5a and 7a were supported.

    Table 2 presents the results of ERGM estimates for the emotional support network. The results for purely structural effects show that the parameter estimates for reciprocity and transitivity were significant for the emotional support network, indicating that patients in online depression communities tend to provide emotional support to each other and are more likely to form new emotional support ties if they share mutual friends. Thus, hypotheses 1b and 2b were supported.

    Table 2. Exponential random graph model estimates for the emotional support network.
    ParameterEstimateSEP valueHypothesisResult
    Purely structural effects

    		Reciprocity4.4111a0.2991<.001Hypothesis 1bSupported

    		Transitivity0.0177a0.0008<.001Hypothesis 2bSupported
    Actor-relation effects

    		Gender0.11220.968.25Hypothesis 3bNot supported

    		Influence0.8325a0.1229<.001Hypothesis 4bSupported

    		Online duration0.5839a0.1333<.001Hypothesis 5bSupported

    		Number of posts2.4025a0.2147<.001Hypothesis 6bSupported

    		Number of replies0.2259a0.1113.04Hypothesis 7bSupported

    		Newcomers–0.4224a0.1165<.001Hypothesis 8bNot supported

    aSignificant effect.

    We then interpreted the ERGM results for the actor-relation effects in the informational support network. We found that there was no significant homophily effect for gender, indicating that there was no empirical evidence that patients of the same gender are more likely to form emotional support ties. Thus, hypothesis 3b was not supported. For other attribute-related effects, significant positive estimates were obtained for the following four parameters: influence, online duration, number of posts, and number of replies. This suggests that users who have great influence, spend much time online, write more posts, and provide more replies to other posts are more likely to form emotional support ties. Thus, hypotheses 4b, 5b, 6b, and 7b were supported. However, we found significant and negative effects for newcomers, indicating that newcomers are less likely than experienced old-timers to receive emotional support. Thus, hypothesis 8b was not supported.

    We then used a bivariate ERGM to model the two social support networks simultaneously and performed the simultaneous analysis of the multirelational network structure using the XPNet program, a multirelational version of the PNet program. Table 3 presents the results of ERGM estimates of cross-network effects.

    Table 3. Exponential random graph model estimates of cross-network effects for the two social support networks.
    ParameterEstimateSEt-ratioHypothesisResult
    Entrainment0.7834a0.2422427.403Hypothesis 9Supported
    Exchange–0.27570.3219367.969Hypothesis 10Not supported

    aSignificant effect.

    Our motivation for studying these two networks simultaneously was to investigate whether the informational support network aligns with the emotional support network in the context of online depression communities. In particular, we sought to examine if the two networks are entrained or exchanged, since entrainment and exchange are the two key bivariate effects of directed networks.

    As seen in Table 3, the multivariate network effects revealed that the two networks are likely to be entrained, which can be seen from the positive and significant entrainment effect. This suggests that users who obtain informational support are more likely to obtain emotional support, and vice versa. Thus, hypothesis 9 was supported. However, the two relations were not exchanged, which was demonstrated by a nonsignificant parameter estimate, indicating that there was no significant evidence that users who received informational support were more likely to give emotional support to those informational support providers and vice versa. Thus, hypothesis 10 was not supported.

    To examine whether the ERGMs in the study fit the observed network well, we employed graphical evaluations of the goodness of fit to visualize the match between the predicted and observed networks (Figures 4 and 5). In the plots, the thick black line represents the observed network and the gray lines show the 95% confidence interval of simulated network measures. When the black line falls between the gray lines, the simulated networks are capturing the characteristics of the observed network. The first and second plots in Figures 4 and 5 represent the out-degree distribution and in-degree distribution, respectively. The goodness of fit for out-degree and in-degree showed that observed and simulated networks were not significantly different. The third plot displays another network statistic, the distribution of geodesic distances, which represents the pairwise shortest distances between nodes, and also illustrates that the models provide a good fit between the simulated and observed networks.

    ‎
    Figure 4. Goodness of fit for measures from simulated informational support networks.
    View this figure
    ‎
    Figure 5. Goodness of fit for measures from simulated emotional support networks.
    View this figure

    Principal Findings

    This article examined endogenous effects (purely structural effects) and exogenous effects (actor-relation effects) on the formation of the informational and emotional support networks of patients in online depression communities separately and then explored cross-network effects between the two networks. Some valuable findings were obtained as follows.

    First, the results of this study provide support for the effects of some important structural features on the formation of two support networks. We found that social ties in online depression communities are reciprocal and transitive, which is in line with the findings of network theories about tie formation showing that reciprocity and transitivity are seen as the basic principles of social interaction [18]. Reciprocation and transitive closure lead us to suggest that users in online depression communities prefer to develop social ties through information interaction and mutual emotional encouragement and are also willing to form new social relationships with users who share mutual friends. The result is in accordance with the previous studies [55-57], proposing that these structural effects will help the diffusion of information and create an atmosphere of mutual support, as well as promote the sustainable development of online depression communities.

    Second, we examined the effects of some individual factors on the formation of the two networks and found that actor-relation effects may differ between the two networks. Gender is not an important determinant of the formation of either the informational support network or the emotional support network. Users were willing to communicate not only with people of the same gender but also with the opposite sex. The results are in accordance with some previous research about gender-typical behaviors and cross-gender friendships. Some studies pointed out that men consider their cross-gender friendships as expressive, whereas women consider their cross-gender friendships as, if anything, instrumental [58]. Thus, we have reason to believe that male users are also likely to develop emotional support networks with female users, not just with male users, while female users are also likely to develop informational support networks with male users, not only with female users. On one hand, women usually have a stronger sense of community identification and feel more responsible than men toward other members [59]. Men tend to be more open, more self-disclosing, and more intimate with female friends than with male friends [58]. Therefore, it is possible that male users in online depression communities may receive more emotional support from female users. For example, one study found that men living without a spouse in the household were more likely to lack emotional support and were more vulnerable to depression than women in the same situation [28], and thus men living without a spouse are more likely to develop an emotional network with female users. On the other hand, according to sex role theory, which posits that the female gender role is associated with less power and lower social status [60,61], women are more likely to need informational support. Compared with women tending to use strategies that modify their emotional response, men tend to deal with depression by problem-focused coping [62], so it is possible that female users in online depression communities may receive more informational support from male users. The results are in line with the earlier finding that male users’ postings are usually more professional and contained more professional knowledge than female users’ postings in online health communities [30], so both male and female users are more inclined to develop informational support networks with male users.

    For other attribute-related effects, we found that users who spent a lot of time online were more likely to form both informational and emotional support ties. A possible explanation is that users with more online time are considered to be centrally embedded in the network. Scholars have pointed out that a person’s position in the network influences his/her willingness and ability to communicate with others [63]. The closer a person is to the center of the network, the more he/she has opportunities to participate in interactive activities to provide informational and emotional support with other members. We also found that those users who provide more replies to other posts are more likely to form both informational and emotional support ties. A possible explanation is that users can accumulate their own social capital by actively interacting with others. According to social capital theory, users would like to provide more replies to other posts when they perceive that doing so enhances their online reputations [64]. Accumulated reputation could bring them certain indirect benefits, such as becoming known to community members, thereby potentially increasing their opportunities to obtain informational and emotional support. However, some individual attributes have different effects on the formation of different networks. We discovered evidence that users who had great influence and wrote more posts were more likely to develop emotional support ties, but there was no tendency for these users to develop informational support ties more easily. A possible explanation is that these users were patients who had experienced long-term struggles with depression and thus had first-hand experience of preventing and dealing with the disease. These users with a high level of expertise preferred to contribute their knowledge and experience to help others rather than to obtain information. However, these contributors were likely to develop stronger emotional ties than others. According to the norm of reciprocity in social capital theory, contributors expect the mutual reciprocity that justifies their expense in terms of time and effort spent contributing their own knowledge [65]. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that they are likely to receive more emotional support because their contribution efforts will be reciprocated by other members.

    In addition, we found that newcomers did not get more informational support than old-timers and they were even less likely than old-timers to receive emotional support. It is possible that newcomers lack the necessary skills to make use of social networks to obtain information. In the meantime, they receive less attention because of the lack of accumulation of social capital, making it difficult for them to get more emotional support. This argument is supported by a recent study by Lu et al [43], which found that it is difficult for newcomers involved in online depression communities to increase their social capital in a very short period of time and they will take a considerable amount of time contributing to the online community to establish mutual trust with other members.

    Finally, we examined the association between the two social networks and the results revealed that the informational support network does not always align with the emotional support network in the context of online depression communities. There was a significant entrainment effect and a nonsignificant exchange effect between the two networks. This suggests that users who obtain informational support are more likely to obtain emotional support simultaneously. The result is in line with the discussion above, suggesting that users can accumulate their own social capital through long-term participation in online communities or actively interacting with others, and those with more social capital will more easily receive informational and emotional support simultaneously [64]. However, the reverse statement is not necessarily true. That is to say, users don’t necessarily provide informational support to those who provide them with emotional support. A possible explanation is that for users with lower social status and newcomers, they lack the necessary knowledge and it is difficult for them to provide effective informational support to others [66-69]. When they obtain emotional support from members, they are more inclined to develop reciprocal relationships and also to provide emotional support to those who provide them with emotional support, such as encouraging each other to fight against the illness together.

    Limitations

    This study has some limitations. First, the ERGMs used in this study were cross-sectional models, but more information about dynamic social processes could not be obtained from a cross-sectional view. We should consider extending the ERGMs to longitudinal data in further studies. Second, we mainly focused on the informational support network and the emotional support network. However, users in online depression communities may establish all kinds of social ties. For example, adding friends and following celebrities will probably form social ties. It is worth further study how these social ties will affect the formation of the two support networks. Third, we consider that other demographic factors, including age and location of residence, may also be important sources of homophily. However, considering that it was difficult to obtain empirical data on demographics in our sample, it is temporarily unfeasible to study the other demographic factors. We will consider the issue in further studies. Finally, we only used a binary classification for gender in the study. While there are clear pragmatic reasons for this, it is well known that individuals with sexual or gender orientations that are seen to deviate from the norm may experience higher rates of depression. This should be taken into account in future research.

    Conclusions

    The online depression community is increasingly seen as a promising communication platform for patients suffering from depression, where they can exchange valuable medical information to form an informational support network and provide emotional support to one another to form an emotional support network. While many studies focus on the benefits of social support networks, however, little is known about how patients with depression develop social support networks through online health communities. This paper attempted to apply social network theories to examine which endogenous and exogenous factors will affect the formation of the two support networks and whether there is an association between the two networks. ERGMs were used in our study to test the hypotheses about the effects of network structure and individual attributes on the formation of the informational and emotional support networks. We then chose a popular online health platform for Chinese patients with depression as the data source to empirically test the proposed hypotheses. The results showed some important effects of structural features—namely reciprocity and transitivity—on the formation of the support networks. The results also provided support for the effects of some individual factors on the formation of the two networks respectively. For example, users who spent a lot of time online and provided more replies to other posts were more likely to form both informational and emotional support ties. However, some actor-relation effects may differ between the two networks. For example, we discovered evidence that the users who had great influence and wrote more posts were more likely to develop emotional support ties, while there was no tendency for these users to develop informational support ties more easily. In addition, we examined the association between the two social networks and found that the informational support network did not always align with the emotional support network in the context of online depression communities. There was a significant entrainment effect and a nonsignificant exchange effect between the two networks.

    This study makes several important theoretical contributions to the research on online depression communities. First, our research provides new insights into online social support from online depression communities. Recent studies have suggested that online social support can bring considerable benefits to patients with depression [9-11]. However, few studies have focused on the mechanism of the formation of social relationships or explored which factors have significant effects on the formation of social support ties. This study aimed to investigate what types of patients are more likely to form social ties in online depression communities and to help them develop online social ties to improve their conditions. Second, our research contributes to the previous research by adopting social network theories to analyze the social support networks in the context of online depression communities. In this study, we divided the social support networks into the informational support network and emotional support network, and proposed that network self-organization, individual attributes, and exogenous contextual factors have significant effects on the formation of the two social support networks. Third, we developed a new theoretical model by applying ERGMs to analyze important structural features and user attributes that affect the formation of social networks. Eighteen research hypotheses were proposed and empirically tested. The empirical results reveal that some of the hypotheses were supported whereas others were not. The findings help us to better understand the formation of the two social networks.

    Our research has important practical implications for the managers of online depression communities and the users involved in these online communities. First, the empirical results help the managers to better understand online social networks and take specific measures to develop social support networks in online depression communities. The results revealed that social ties in online depression communities are reciprocal and patients prefer to communicate and share experiences with peers who have the same conditions. Thus, the managers may provide humanized supporting functions to facilitate community members to find their peers who have the same conditions. The results also revealed that social ties are transitive and patients are more likely to form new informational support ties with individuals who share mutual friends. Thus, the managers may provide them with more opportunities to discover topics that interest them and create a welcoming atmosphere in which patients can easily share ideas and express emotions with each other. Second, our results make it clear what patients should do to better develop the two types of support networks. We found that long-term users and those who provide more replies to other posts are more likely to form informational support ties, while those users who had great influence, spend much time online, write more posts, and provide more replies to other posts are more likely to form emotional support ties. These findings may help patients to better develop their social support networks to improve their conditions.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported in part by the MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences under Grant 18YJC630117, in part by the Social Science Foundation of Beijing under Grant 19GLC064, in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71971082, in part by the Key Soft Science Projects in Shanghai under Grant 19692106700, and in part by the Funds for First-class Discipline Construction under Grant XK1802-5.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Keywords in the information dictionary and emotion dictionary.

    DOCX File , 17 KB
    1. Kessler RC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Chatterji S, Lee S, Ormel J, et al. The global burden of mental disorders: an update from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2009;18(1):23-33 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Friedrich M. Depression Is the Leading Cause of Disability Around the World. JAMA 2017 Apr 18;317(15):1517. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ 2004 May 15;328(7449):1166 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Howell EA, Mora PA, DiBonaventura MD, Leventhal H. Modifiable factors associated with changes in postpartum depressive symptoms. Arch Womens Ment Health 2009 Apr;12(2):113-120. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Bartlett YK, Coulson NS. An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects health professional/patient communication. Patient Educ Couns 2011 Apr;83(1):113-119. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013. Health 2013:1-55 [FREE Full text]
    7. Setoyama Y, Yamazaki Y, Namayama K. Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters. J Med Internet Res 2011 Dec 29;13(4):e122 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Høybye MT, Dalton SO, Deltour I, Bidstrup PE, Frederiksen K, Johansen C. Effect of Internet peer-support groups on psychosocial adjustment to cancer: a randomised study. Br J Cancer 2010 Apr 27;102(9):1348-1354 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Swan M. Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009 Feb;6(2):492-525 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Sanger PC, Hartzler A, Lordon RJ, Armstrong CA, Lober WB, Evans HL, et al. A patient-centered system in a provider-centered world: challenges of incorporating post-discharge wound data into practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016 May;23(3):514-525 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Nimrod G. Online depression communities: members' interests and perceived benefits. Health Commun 2013;28(5):425-434. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. LeBesco K. Book Review: Bambina. A. (2007). Online Social Support: The Interplay of Social Networks and Computer-Mediated Communication. Youngstown, NY: Cambria. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 2008 May 08;27(3):312-314. [CrossRef]
    13. Dickerson SS. Women's use of the Internet: what nurses need to know. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006;35(1):151-156. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Robins G. Exponential random graph models for social networks. Soc Networks 2009;31(1):12-25. [CrossRef]
    15. Zhao Y. Rank Olaf. Interdependencies between working relations: Multivariate ERGMs for advice and satisfaction. Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods and Applications. - 2013;213:225. [CrossRef]
    16. Pan W, Shen C, Feng B. You Get What You Give: Understanding Reply Reciprocity and Social Capital in Online Health Support Forums. J Health Commun 2017 Jan;22(1):45-52. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Bliss CA, Kloumann IM, Harris KD, Danforth CM, Dodds PS. Twitter reciprocal reply networks exhibit assortativity with respect to happiness. Journal of Computational Science 2012 Sep;3(5):388-397. [CrossRef]
    18. Lusher D, Robins G. Formation of social network structure. In Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, MethodsApplications, Lusher D, Koskinen J. Robins G (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; 2013.
    19. Emirbayer M. Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 1997 Sep;103(2):281-317. [CrossRef]
    20. Kilduff, Martin K, David. Interpersonal Networks in OrganizationsM// Interpersonal networks in organizations :. Cambridge University Press 2008. [CrossRef]
    21. Parkhe A, Wasserman S, Ralston DA. New Frontiers in Network Theory Development. AMR 2006 Jul;31(3):560-568. [CrossRef]
    22. Mislove A, Marcon M, Gummadi K, Druschel P, Bhattacharjee B. MeasurementAnalysis of Online Social Networks. 2007 Oct 24 Presented at: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, IMC. . 10.1145/1298306.1298311; 2007; San Diego p. 29-42. [CrossRef]
    23. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annu Rev Sociol 2001 Aug;27(1):415-444. [CrossRef]
    24. Rosario M, Shinn M, Mørch H, Huckabee CB. Gender differences in coping and social supports: Testing socialization and role constraint theories. J. Community Psychol 1988 Jan;16(1):55-69. [CrossRef]
    25. Solomon LJ, Rothblum ED. Stress, coping, and social support in women. Behavior Therapist 1986;9(10):199-204.
    26. Vaux A. Variations in Social Support Associated with Gender, Ethnicity, and Age. Journal of Social Issues 2010;41(1):89-110. [CrossRef]
    27. Slavin LA, Rainer KL. Gender differences in emotional support and depressive symptoms among adolescents: a prospective analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology 1990;18(3):407-421. [CrossRef]
    28. Sonnenberg C, Deeg D, van Tilburg T, Vink D, Stek M, Beekman A. Gender differences in the relation between depression and social support in later life. Int Psychogeriatr 2013 Jan 27;25(1):61-70. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Thelwall M. Homophily in MySpace. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2009 Feb;60(2):219-231. [CrossRef]
    30. Liu X, Sun M, Li J. Research on gender differences in online health communities. Int J Med Inform 2018 Mar;111:172-181. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Billings AG, Moos RH. Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984;46(4):877-891. [CrossRef]
    32. Brown G, Harris T. eds. Social origins of depression: A study of psychiatric disorder in women. Vol. 2. Routledge 2012:A. [CrossRef]
    33. Wasserman S. Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Structural analysis in the social sciences) (19th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1994. [CrossRef]
    34. Hanaki N, Peterhansl A, Dodds PS, Watts DJ. Cooperation in Evolving Social Networks. Management Science 2007 Jul;53(7):1036-1050. [CrossRef]
    35. Albert R, Barabási A. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys 2002 Jan 30;74(1):47-97. [CrossRef]
    36. Barabási A, Albert R. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-512. [CrossRef]
    37. Ballantine PW, Stephenson RJ. Help me, I'm fat! Social support in online weight loss networks. J Consumer Behav 2011 Dec 23;10(6):332-337. [CrossRef]
    38. Lavie D, Drori I. Collaborating for Knowledge Creation and Application: The Case of Nanotechnology Research Programs. Organization Science 2012 Jun;23(3):704-724. [CrossRef]
    39. Priya N. Information seeking and social support in online health communities: impact on patients' perceived empathy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;3(18):298-304. [CrossRef]
    40. Zhang X, Liu S, Chen X, Gong Y. MD 2017 Aug 21;55(7):1536-1557. [CrossRef]
    41. Yan Z, Wang T, Chen Y, Zhang H. Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management 2016 Jul;53(5):643-653. [CrossRef]
    42. Nath C, Huh J, Adupa AK, Jonnalagadda SR. Website Sharing in Online Health Communities: A Descriptive Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2016 Jan 13;18(1):e11. [CrossRef]
    43. Lu Y, Pan T, Deng S. What Drives Patients Affected by Depression to Share in Online Depression Communities? A Social Capital Perspective. Healthcare 2019 Nov 04;7(4):133. [CrossRef]
    44. Chang HH, Chuang S. Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information & Management 2011 Jan;48(1):9-18. [CrossRef]
    45. Chung JE. Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients. J Health Commun 2014;19(6):639-659. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Constant D, Kiesler S, Sproull L. What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing. Information Systems Research 1994 Dec;5(4):400-421. [CrossRef]
    47. Stewart, Gosain. The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams. MIS Quarterly 2006;30(2):291. [CrossRef]
    48. Robins G, Daraganova G. Exponential random graph models for social networksocial selection, dyadic covariates, and geospatial effects. Social Networks 2012;31(1):12-25. [CrossRef]
    49. Wangxponential RGMEMFMNN. In Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, MethodsApplications, Lusher D, Koskinen J. Robins G (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; 2013:115-129.
    50. Robins G, Pattison P, Kalish Y, Lusher D. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 2007 May;29(2):173-191. [CrossRef]
    51. Snijders TAB, Pattison PE, Robins GL, Handcock MS. New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models. Sociological Methodology 2016 Jun 23;36(1):99-153. [CrossRef]
    52. Wasserman S, Pattison P. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p. Psychometrika 1996 Sep;61(3):401-425. [CrossRef]
    53. Robins G, Pattison P, Wang P. Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Social Networks 2009 May;31(2):105-117. [CrossRef]
    54. Dean L, Johan K, Garry R. Exponential random graph models for social networks: theories, methods and applications. Social Networks 2013;31(1):12-25. [CrossRef]
    55. Naslund JA, Bondre A, Torous J, Aschbrenner KA. Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice. J Technol Behav Sci 2020 Apr 20;5(3):245-257. [CrossRef]
    56. Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Marsch LA, Bartels SJ. The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2016 Jan 08;25(2):113-122. [CrossRef]
    57. Naslund JA, Grande SW, Aschbrenner KA, Elwyn G. Naturally Occurring Peer Support through Social Media: The Experiences of Individuals with Severe Mental Illness Using YouTube. PLoS ONE 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e110171. [CrossRef]
    58. Wright PH, Scanlon MB. Gender role orientations and friendship: Some attenuation, but gender differences abound. Sex Roles 1991 May;24(9-10):551-566. [CrossRef]
    59. Eagly AH, Wood W. Explaining Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Perspective. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2016 Jul 02;17(3):306-315. [CrossRef]
    60. Hayden B, Deal M, Cannon A, Casey J. Ecological determinants of women's status among hunter/gatherers. Hum Evol 1986 Oct;1(5):449-473. [CrossRef]
    61. Salzman P. Is Inequality Universal? Current Anthropology 1999 Feb;40(1):31-61. [CrossRef]
    62. Matud M. Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences 2004 Nov;37(7):1401-1415. [CrossRef]
    63. Wasko, Faraj. Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly 2005;29(1):35. [CrossRef]
    64. Tsai W, Ghoshal S. Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal 1998 Aug 01;41(4):464-476.
    65. Chiu C, Hsu M, Wang ET. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 2006 Dec;42(3):1872-1888. [CrossRef]
    66. Eagly AH, Crowley M. Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin 1986;100(3):283-308. [CrossRef]
    67. Eagly AH, Steffen VJ. Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin 1986;100(3):309-330. [CrossRef]
    68. Wood W, Rhodes N, Whelan M. Sex differences in positive well-being: A consideration of emotional style and marital status. Psychological Bulletin 1989 Sep;106(2):249-264. [CrossRef]
    69. Booth A, Granger DA, Mazur A, Kivlighan KT. Testosterone and Social Behavior. Social Forces 2006 Sep 01;85(1):167-191. [CrossRef]

    ‎
    ERGM: exponential random graph model
    MCMC-MLE: Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation
    RQ: research question

    Edited by C Lovis; submitted 28.09.20; peer-reviewed by X Song, K Rolls; comments to author 18.10.20; revised version received 16.11.20; accepted 05.12.20; published 07.01.21

    Copyright

    ©Yingjie Lu, Shuwen Luo, Xuan Liu. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 07.01.2021.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.