Published on in Vol 6, No 2 (2018): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/8734, first published .
Nurses’ Experience With Health Information Technology: Longitudinal Qualitative Study

Nurses’ Experience With Health Information Technology: Longitudinal Qualitative Study

Nurses’ Experience With Health Information Technology: Longitudinal Qualitative Study

Journals

  1. Sun S, Hwang H, Dutta B, Peng M. Exploring critical factors influencing nurses’ intention to use tablet PC in Patients’ care using an integrated theoretical model. Libyan Journal of Medicine 2019;14(1) View
  2. Anderberg P, Björling G, Stjernberg L, Bohman D. Analyzing Nursing Students’ Relation to Electronic Health and Technology as Individuals and Students and in Their Future Career (the eNursEd Study): Protocol for a Longitudinal Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2019;8(10):e14643 View
  3. McAlearney A, Hefner J, MacEwan S, Gaughan A, DePuccio M, Walker D, Hogan C, Fareed N, Sieck C, Huerta T. Care Team Perspectives About an Inpatient Portal: Benefits and Challenges of Patients’ Portal Use During Hospitalization. Medical Care Research and Review 2021;78(5):537 View
  4. Khanna A, Ahuja S, Weller R, Harwood T. Postoperative ward monitoring – Why and what now?. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 2019;33(2):229 View
  5. Chérrez-Ojeda I, Felix M, Mata V, Vanegas E, Simancas-Racines D, Aguilar M, Gavilanes A, Chedraui P, Vera C. Use and Perceptions of Information and Communication Technologies Among Ecuadorian Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study. The Open Nursing Journal 2020;14(1):8 View
  6. Lindhardt C, Mattsson T, Mebrouk J. Point-of-care used in the treatment of older patients with cancer. The perception and experience of nurses. Applied Nursing Research 2020;53:151268 View
  7. Bail K, Merrick E, Redley B, Gibson J, Davey R, Currie M. “Blind leading the blind”: Qualitative evaluation of unanticipated difficulties during nurse testing of a hospital health information system. Collegian 2020;27(1):82 View
  8. O'Connor S, Chu C, Thilo F, Lee J, Mather C, Topaz M. Professionalism in a digital and mobile world: A way forward for nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2020;76(1):4 View
  9. Chérrez-Ojeda I, Felix M, Mata V, Vanegas E, Simancas-Racines D, Aguilar M, Gavilanes A, Chedraui P, Vera C. Use and Perceptions of Information and Communication Technologies Among Ecuadorian Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study. The Open Nursing Journal 2020;14(1):8 View
  10. Helou S, Abou-Khalil V, Yamamoto G, Kondoh E, Tamura H, Hiragi S, Sugiyama O, Okamoto K, Nambu M, Kuroda T. Understanding the Situated Roles of Electronic Medical Record Systems to Enable Redesign: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Human Factors 2019;6(3):e13812 View
  11. Darawad M, Othman E, Alosta M. Nurses' satisfaction with barcode medication‐administration technology: Results of a cross‐sectional study. Nursing & Health Sciences 2019;21(4):461 View
  12. Matter S, Wolgast K. Making Good Use of Your Limited Time. Nursing Clinics of North America 2020;55(1):39 View
  13. Farokhzadian J, Khajouei R, Hasman A, Ahmadian L. Nurses’ experiences and viewpoints about the benefits of adopting information technology in health care: a qualitative study in Iran. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2020;20(1) View
  14. Tolentino D, Gephart S. State of the Science of Dimensions of Nurses' User Experience When Using an Electronic Health Record. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2021;39(2):69 View
  15. Huang F. Caring for Computers: The Hidden Work of Clinical Nurses during the Introduction of Health Information Systems in a Teaching Hospital in Taiwan. Nursing Reports 2021;11(1):105 View
  16. Dunn Lopez K, Chin C, Leitão Azevedo R, Kaushik V, Roy B, Schuh W, Banks K, Sousa V, Morrow D. Electronic health record usability and workload changes over time for provider and nursing staff following transition to new EHR. Applied Ergonomics 2021;93:103359 View
  17. Kuusisto A, Santavirta J, Saranto K, Suominen T, Asikainen P. Nursing staff’s assessments of medication management process in the psychiatric and operative domains: A cross‐sectional study after introduction of an electronic medication chart. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2022;36(4):935 View
  18. Whalen K, Grella P, Snydeman C, Dwyer A, Yager P. Nursing Attitudes and Practices in Code Documentation Employing a New Electronic Health Record. Applied Clinical Informatics 2021;12(03):589 View
  19. Arikan F, Kara H, Erdogan E, Ulker F. Barriers to Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems from the Perspective of Nurses. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2022;40(4):236 View
  20. Manetti S, Cumetti M, De Benedictis A, Lettieri E. Adoption of novel biomarker test parameters with machine learning‐based algorithms for the early detection of sepsis in hospital practice. Journal of Nursing Management 2022;30(8):3754 View
  21. Burgess J, Honey M. Nurse Leaders Enabling Nurses to Adopt Digital Health: Results of an Integrative Literature Review. Nursing Praxis in Aotearoa New Zealand 2022;38(3) View
  22. Pérez-Martí M, Casadó-Marín L, Guillén-Villar A. Electronic Records With Tablets at the Point of Care in an Internal Medicine Unit: Before-After Time Motion Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(1):e30512 View
  23. Wright A, Mattacola E, Burgess L, Smith L, Finlay K. The impact of flash glucose monitoring on the clinical practice of healthcare professionals working in diabetes care. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2022;183:109157 View
  24. Carboni C, Wehrens R, van der Veen R, de Bont A. Conceptualizing the digitalization of healthcare work: A metaphor-based Critical Interpretive Synthesis. Social Science & Medicine 2022;292:114572 View
  25. Clavijo-Chamorro M, Sanz-Martos S, Gómez-Luque A, Romero-Zarallo G, López-Medina I. Context as a Facilitator of the Implementation of Evidence-based Nursing: A Meta-synthesis. Western Journal of Nursing Research 2021;43(1):60 View
  26. Heponiemi T, Gluschkoff K, Vehko T, Kaihlanen A, Saranto K, Nissinen S, Nadav J, Kujala S. Electronic Health Record Implementations and Insufficient Training Endanger Nurses’ Well-being: Cross-sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(12):e27096 View
  27. Renukappa S, Mudiyi P, Suresh S, Abdalla W, Subbarao C. Evaluation of challenges for adoption of smart healthcare strategies. Smart Health 2022;26:100330 View
  28. Forde‐Johnston C, Butcher D, Aveyard H. An integrative review exploring the impact of Electronic Health Records (EHR) on the quality of nurse–patient interactions and communication. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2023;79(1):48 View
  29. Busse T, Kernebeck S, Dreier L, Meyer D, Zenz D, Haas P, Zernikow B, Ehlers J. Planning for Implementation Success of an Electronic Cross-Facility Health Record for Pediatric Palliative Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(1):453 View
  30. Jedwab R, Manias E, Redley B, Dobroff N, Hutchinson A. Impacts of technology implementation on nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction and well‐being: A realist review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2023;32(17-18):6037 View
  31. Klawunn R, Albrecht U, Dierks M. Expectations of new technologies in nursing care among hospital patients in Germany – an interview study. Frontiers in Psychology 2023;14 View
  32. Weinschreider J, Tenzek K, Foltz-Ramos K, Jungquist C, Livingston J. Electronic health record competency in graduate nurses: A grounded theory study. Nurse Education Today 2024;132:105987 View
  33. Ronquillo C, Dahinten V, Bungay V, Currie L. Differing Effects of Implementation Leadership Characteristics on Nurses’ Use of mHealth Technologies in Clinical Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. JMIR Nursing 2023;6:e44435 View
  34. Qualey R. Documenting Perioperative Care in the Electronic Health Record. AORN Journal 2023;118(4):261 View
  35. Sánchez-Sánchez M, Campos-Asensio C, Arias-Rivera S. Workloads of intensive care nurses. Validity of their estimation using mobile applications and comparison with Nursing Activities Score. Systematised review of the literature. Enfermería Intensiva (English ed.) 2024;35(3):229 View
  36. Sánchez-Sánchez M, Campos-Asensio C, Arias-Rivera S. Cargas de trabajo de las enfermeras en cuidados intensivos. Validez de su estimación mediante aplicaciones para dispositivos móviles y comparación con nursing activities score. Revisión sistematizada de la literatura. Enfermería Intensiva 2024;35(3):229 View
  37. Knop M, Mueller M, Kaiser S, Rester C. The impact of digital technology use on nurses' professional identity and relations of power: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2024;80(11):4346 View
  38. Gilvari T, Rahgoi A, Zabolypour S, Rafiee Vardanjani L, Fallahi Khoshknab M. POSTMODERNISM: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING: A NARRATIVE REVIEW. Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2024;21(12):944 View
  39. Gauthier-Wetzel H. Bedside Nurse Documentation Practices. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2024;42(9):629 View
  40. Cachata D, Costa M, Magalhães T, Gaspar F. The Integration of Information Technology in the Management and Organization of Nursing Care in a Hospital Environment: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2024;21(8):968 View
  41. Norouzi S, Nematollahi M, Ahmadian L. The barriers and challenges of using health information technology in medication administration process for pediatrics and neonates: A qualitative study. Health Science Reports 2024;7(8) View
  42. Bingil J. On the Innovative World of Care: Unveiling the Lived Experiences of Nurses in Using an Electronic Health Information System. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives 2024;2(7) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Rekha Makanjee C. New Research in Nursing - Education and Practice. View