This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Viewpoints on and Experiences with Digital Technologies in Health (89) Policy Paper (16)

Published on in Vol 5, No 4 (2017): Oct-Dec

Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators

Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators

Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators

Authors of this article:

Laura Desveaux1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   James Shaw1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ross Wallace1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Onil Bhattacharyya1, 2, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   R Sacha Bhatia1, 2, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Trevor Jamieson1, 5, 6 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (38) Metrics

Journals

  1. Wilson K, Bell C, Wilson L, Witteman H. Agile research to complement agile development: a proposal for an mHealth research lifecycle. npj Digital Medicine 2018;1(1) View
  2. Shaw J, Agarwal P, Desveaux L, Palma D, Stamenova V, Jamieson T, Yang R, Bhatia R, Bhattacharyya O. Beyond “implementation”: digital health innovation and service design. npj Digital Medicine 2018;1(1) View
  3. Kelley L, Fujioka J, Liang K, Cooper M, Jamieson T, Desveaux L. Barriers to Creating Scalable Business Models for Digital Health Innovation in Public Systems: Qualitative Case Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2020;6(4):e20579 View
  4. Desveaux L, Soobiah C, Bhatia R, Shaw J. Identifying and Overcoming Policy-Level Barriers to the Implementation of Digital Health Innovation: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(12):e14994 View
  5. Saad A, Bruno D, Camara B, D’Agostino J, Bolea-Alamanac B. Self-directed Technology-Based Therapeutic Methods for Adult Patients Receiving Mental Health Services: Systematic Review. JMIR Mental Health 2021;8(11):e27404 View
  6. Apostolopoulos S, Makris I, Stavroyiannis S. Healthcare Innovation in Greece: The Views of Private Health Entrepreneurs on Implementing Innovative Plans. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2022;8(2):78 View
  7. Laka M, Carter D, Milazzo A, Merlin T. Challenges and opportunities in implementing clinical decision support systems (CDSS) at scale: Interviews with Australian policymakers. Health Policy and Technology 2022;11(3):100652 View
  8. Genge C, McNeil H, Debergue P, Freeman S. Technology to support aging in place: key messages for policymakers and funders. Frontiers in Psychology 2023;14 View
  9. Wang T, Giunti G, Goossens R, Melles M. Timing, Indicators, and Approaches to Digital Patient Experience Evaluation: Umbrella Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e46308 View
  10. Matson T, Hermes E, Lyon A, Quanbeck A, Schueller S, Wilson S, Glass J. A Framework for Designing Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trials for Digital Health Interventions. Annals of Epidemiology 2025 View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Pascarelli C, Colucci C, Mitrano G, Corallo A. 2023 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC). Business Models in Digital Health: Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review View