This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Viewpoints on and Experiences with Digital Technologies in Health (83) Policy Paper (16)

Published on in Vol 5, No 4 (2017): Oct-Dec

Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators

Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators

Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators

Authors of this article:

Laura Desveaux1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   James Shaw1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ross Wallace1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Onil Bhattacharyya1, 2, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   R Sacha Bhatia1, 2, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Trevor Jamieson1, 5, 6 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (40) Metrics

Journals

  1. Wilson K, Bell C, Wilson L, Witteman H. Agile research to complement agile development: a proposal for an mHealth research lifecycle. npj Digital Medicine 2018;1(1) View
  2. Shaw J, Agarwal P, Desveaux L, Palma D, Stamenova V, Jamieson T, Yang R, Bhatia R, Bhattacharyya O. Beyond “implementation”: digital health innovation and service design. npj Digital Medicine 2018;1(1) View
  3. Kelley L, Fujioka J, Liang K, Cooper M, Jamieson T, Desveaux L. Barriers to Creating Scalable Business Models for Digital Health Innovation in Public Systems: Qualitative Case Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2020;6(4):e20579 View
  4. Desveaux L, Soobiah C, Bhatia R, Shaw J. Identifying and Overcoming Policy-Level Barriers to the Implementation of Digital Health Innovation: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(12):e14994 View
  5. Saad A, Bruno D, Camara B, D’Agostino J, Bolea-Alamanac B. Self-directed Technology-Based Therapeutic Methods for Adult Patients Receiving Mental Health Services: Systematic Review. JMIR Mental Health 2021;8(11):e27404 View
  6. Apostolopoulos S, Makris I, Stavroyiannis S. Healthcare Innovation in Greece: The Views of Private Health Entrepreneurs on Implementing Innovative Plans. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2022;8(2):78 View
  7. Laka M, Carter D, Milazzo A, Merlin T. Challenges and opportunities in implementing clinical decision support systems (CDSS) at scale: Interviews with Australian policymakers. Health Policy and Technology 2022;11(3):100652 View
  8. Genge C, McNeil H, Debergue P, Freeman S. Technology to support aging in place: key messages for policymakers and funders. Frontiers in Psychology 2023;14 View
  9. Wang T, Giunti G, Goossens R, Melles M. Timing, Indicators, and Approaches to Digital Patient Experience Evaluation: Umbrella Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e46308 View