This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (712)

Published on in Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Apr-Jun

Use and Uptake of eHealth in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey and Focus Group Study Among Health Care Users and General Practitioners

Use and Uptake of eHealth in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey and Focus Group Study Among Health Care Users and General Practitioners

Use and Uptake of eHealth in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey and Focus Group Study Among Health Care Users and General Practitioners

Authors of this article:

Jose M Peeters1 Author Orcid Image ;   Johan W Krijgsman2 Author Orcid Image ;   Anne E Brabers3 Author Orcid Image ;   Judith D De Jong3 Author Orcid Image ;   Roland D Friele3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (56) Tweetations (9) Metrics

Journals

  1. Yousuf H, Reintjens R, Slipszenko E, Blok S, Somsen G, Tulevski I, Hofstra L. Effectiveness of web-based personalised e‑Coaching lifestyle interventions. Netherlands Heart Journal 2019;27(1):24 View
  2. Zucco R, Lavano F, Anfosso R, Bianco A, Pileggi C, Pavia M. Internet and social media use for antibiotic-related information seeking: Findings from a survey among adult population in Italy. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2018;111:131 View
  3. Waller M, Taylor L, Portnoy J. The Medical Virtualist: Is Pediatric Patient Care Using Telemedicine, a New Specialty?. Pediatric Annals 2019;48(6) View
  4. Welbie M, Wittink H, Westerman M, Topper I, Snoei J, Devillé W. A Mobile Patient-Reported Outcome Measure App With Talking Touchscreen: Usability Assessment. JMIR Formative Research 2019;3(3):e11617 View
  5. Tates K, Antheunis M, Kanters S, Nieboer T, Gerritse M. The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(12):e421 View
  6. Torrent-Sellens J, Díaz-Chao Á, Soler-Ramos I, Saigí-Rubió F. Modeling and Predicting Outcomes of eHealth Usage by European Physicians: Multidimensional Approach from a Survey of 9196 General Practitioners. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(10):e279 View
  7. Bartels S, van Knippenberg R, Dassen F, Asaba E, Patomella A, Malinowsky C, Verhey F, de Vugt M. A narrative synthesis systematic review of digital self-monitoring interventions for middle-aged and older adults. Internet Interventions 2019;18:100283 View
  8. Subotic-Kerry M, King C, O'Moore K, Achilles M, O'Dea B. General Practitioners’ Attitudes Toward a Web-Based Mental Health Service for Adolescents: Implications for Service Design and Delivery. JMIR Human Factors 2018;5(1):e12 View
  9. Jones M, Koziel C, Larsen D, Berry P, Kubatka-Willms E. Progress in the Enhanced Use of Electronic Medical Records: Data From the Ontario Experience. JMIR Medical Informatics 2017;5(1):e5 View
  10. van Boekel L, Peek S, Luijkx K. Diversiteit in internetgebruik door Nederlandse ouderen. Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen 2018;96(1):32 View
  11. van der Kleij R, Kasteleyn M, Meijer E, Bonten T, Houwink E, Teichert M, van Luenen S, Vedanthan R, Evers A, Car J, Pinnock H, Chavannes N. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 1: Concepts, conditions and challenges. European Journal of General Practice 2019;25(4):179 View
  12. Anttila M, Kivistö H, Piirainen A, Kokko K, Malinen A, Pekkonen M, Sjögren T. Cardiac Rehabilitees’ Technology Experiences Before Remote Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study Using a Grounded Theory Approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(2):e10985 View
  13. Bonten T, Chavannes N. De toekomst van e‑health in de huisartsenpraktijk. Bijblijven 2016;32(5):321 View
  14. Firet L, de Bree C, Verhoeks C, Teunissen D, Lagro-Janssen A. Mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study. BMC Family Practice 2019;20(1) View
  15. Xiong Y, Wang D, Chen H, Wang X, Zhang X. Development and Validation of Online Textual Pediatrician-Parent Communication Instrument Based on the SEGUE Framework. BioMed Research International 2019;2019:1 View
  16. Bally E, Cesuroglu T. Toward Integration of mHealth in Primary Care in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives. Frontiers in Public Health 2020;7 View
  17. van Boekel L, Peek S, Luijkx K. Diversity in Older Adults’ Use of the Internet: Identifying Subgroups Through Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(5):e180 View
  18. Carter M, Fletcher E, Sansom A, Warren F, Campbell J. Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online alternative to face-to-face consultation in general practice: a mixed-methods study of webGP in six Devon practices. BMJ Open 2018;8(2):e018688 View
  19. Kloek C, Bossen D, de Vries H, de Bakker D, Veenhof C, Dekker J. Physiotherapists’ experiences with a blended osteoarthritis intervention: a mixed methods study. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2020;36(5):572 View
  20. Benneworth P, Schulze-Greiving V, Konrad K. Knowledge bases and responsibility within regional innovation systems: reflections from the Twente region. European Planning Studies 2019;27(12):2491 View
  21. Swinkels I, Huygens M, Schoenmakers T, Oude Nijeweme-D'Hollosy W, van Velsen L, Vermeulen J, Schoone-Harmsen M, Jansen Y, van Schayck O, Friele R, de Witte L. Lessons Learned From a Living Lab on the Broad Adoption of eHealth in Primary Health Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(3):e83 View
  22. Wollmann K, der Keylen P, Tomandl J, Meerpohl J, Sofroniou M, Maun A, Voigt-Radloff S. The information needs of internet users and their requirements for online health information—A scoping review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Patient Education and Counseling 2021;104(8):1904 View
  23. Talboom-Kamp E, Ketelaar P, Versluis A. A national program to support self-management for patients with a chronic condition in primary care: A social return on investment analysis. Clinical eHealth 2021;4:45 View
  24. Versluis A, van Luenen S, Meijer E, Honkoop P, Pinnock H, Mohr D, Neves A, Chavannes N, van der Kleij R. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 4: Addressing the challenges of implementation. European Journal of General Practice 2020;26(1):140 View
  25. Parker K, Chia M. Patient and clinician satisfaction with video consultations in dentistry - part two: clinician satisfaction. British Dental Journal 2021 View
  26. Parker K, Chia M. Patient and clinician satisfaction with video consultations in dentistry - part one: patient satisfaction. British Dental Journal 2021 View
  27. Bryce C, O'Connell M, Dale J, Underwood M, Atherton H. Online and telephone access to general practice: a cross-sectional patient survey. BJGP Open 2021;5(4):BJGPO.2020.0179 View
  28. Della Vecchia C, Leroy T, Bauquier C, Pannard M, Sarradon-Eck A, Darmon D, Dufour J, Preau M. Willingness of French General Practitioners to Prescribe mHealth Apps and Devices: Quantitative Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(2):e28372 View
  29. Choudhury A, Asan O, Alelyani T. Exploring the Role of the Internet, Care Quality and Communication in Shaping Mental Health: Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 2022;26(1):468 View
  30. Fernández Coves A, Yeung K, van der Putten I, Nelson E. Teleconsultation adoption since COVID-19: Comparison of barriers and facilitators in primary care settings in Hong Kong and the Netherlands. Health Policy 2022;126(10):933 View
  31. Kesar A, Baluch A, Barber O, Hoffmann H, Jovanovic M, Renz D, Stopak B, Wicks P, Gilbert S, Gadekallu T. Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease based on the UK Biobank. PLOS ONE 2022;17(2):e0263940 View
  32. ten Klooster I, Wentzel J, Sieverink F, Linssen G, Wesselink R, van Gemert-Pijnen L. Personas for Better Targeted eHealth Technologies: User-Centered Design Approach. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(1):e24172 View
  33. Schnoor K, Versluis A, Chavannes N, Talboom-Kamp E. The Usability of Homelab, a Digital Self-service at a Dutch General Practice, for Diagnostic Tests: Pilot Study With a Questionnaire. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e42151 View
  34. Cohen Rodrigues T, de Buisonjé D, Keesman M, Reijnders T, van der Geer J, Janssen V, Kraaijenhagen R, Atsma D, Evers A. Facilitators of and Barriers to Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals Working in Cardiac Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(10):e25646 View
  35. Allen J. Exploring Adult Patients’ Perceptions and Experiences of Telemedicine Consultations in Primary Care: A Qualitative Systematic Review. International Journal of Medical Students 2022;10(3):288 View
  36. Wyllie J, Carlson J, Heinsch M, Kay-Lambkin F, McCoy A. eHealth Services and SDG3: Increasing the Capacity of Care. Australasian Marketing Journal 2022;30(2):131 View
  37. Thapa R, Iakovleva T. Responsible innovation in venture creation and firm development: the case of digital innovation in healthcare and welfare services. Journal of Responsible Innovation 2023;10(1) View
  38. Kasteleyn M, Versluis A, van Peet P, Kirk U, van Dalfsen J, Meijer E, Honkoop P, Ho K, Chavannes N, Talboom-Kamp E. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 5: A critical appraisal of five widely used eHealth applications for primary care – opportunities and challenges. European Journal of General Practice 2021;27(1):248 View
  39. Vonken L, Hussein H, Crutzen R, Vluggen S. Perceptions of Dutch general practitioners towards eHealth for patients with type-2 diabetes: a qualitative study. Family Practice 2023;40(1):91 View
  40. Wessels N, Ruiter E, Hulshof L, Loohuis A, van Gemert-Pijnen J, Metting E, van der Worp H, Blanker M. Care provider views on app-based treatment for female urinary incontinence: A mixed-methods study. Continence 2023;6:100584 View
  41. Tudor Car L, Teng Y, How J, Nazri N, Tan A, Quah J, Peckham S, Smith H. Priorities for family physician and general practitioner recruitment and retention in Singapore: a PRIORITIZE study. BMC Family Practice 2021;22(1) View
  42. van Boxtel J, Wessels N, Ruiter E, Loohuis A, Metting E, van der Worp H, Blanker M. Perspective of Dutch healthcare professionals on care for female urinary incontinence: A mixed-methods study. Continence 2023;6:100585 View
  43. Wangler J, Jansky M. Two years of approved digital health applications in Germany – Perspectives and experiences of general practitioners with an affinity for their use. European Journal of General Practice 2023;29(1) View
  44. van Kessel R, Roman-Urrestarazu A, Anderson M, Kyriopoulos I, Field S, Monti G, Reed S, Pavlova M, Wharton G, Mossialos E. Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e48000 View
  45. Mandal Y, Jha K, Kumar G, Singh A, Barman D, Menon I. Assessing knowledge, attitude, and readiness to use e.health among doctors in a tertiary health care unit in Bhubaneswar city, Odisha - A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Education and Health Promotion 2023;12(1) View
  46. Schwarz M, Ward E, Coccetti A, Simmons J, Burrett S, Juffs P, Perkins K, Foley J. Identifying opportunities to optimise the electronic medical record for allied health professionals: a concept mapping study. Australian Health Review 2023;47(3):369 View
  47. Fagerström M, Löf M, Müssener U, Thomas K. The importance of trusting conditions for organizations’ readiness to implement mHealth to support healthy lifestyle behaviors: An interview study within Swedish child and school healthcare. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  48. Scheckel B, Schmidt K, Stock S, Redaèlli M. Patient Portals as Facilitators of Engagement in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Heart Disease: Scoping Review of Usage and Usability. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e38447 View
  49. Neirat D, Batran A, Ayed A. Development of an electronic medical records project for Al-Razi hospital in Palestine. Journal of Public Health Research 2023;12(4) View
  50. Wu Q, Ngien A, Jiang S. Descriptive Norms and eHealth Use Among Older Adults: A Cross-Country Comparative Study. Health Communication 2024;39(12):2971 View
  51. Wangler J, Jansky M. How can primary care benefit from digital health applications? – a quantitative, explorative survey on attitudes and experiences of general practitioners in Germany. BMC Digital Health 2024;2(1) View
  52. Huettemann R, Sevov B, Meister S, Fehring L. Understanding citizens’ attitudes within user-centered digital health ecosystems: A sequential mixed method methodology including a web-survey. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  53. Atherton H, Eccles A, Poltawski L, Dale J, Campbell J, Abel G. Investigating Patient Use and Experience of Online Appointment Booking in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e51931 View
  54. Winder R, Campbell J, Akter N, Aminu A, Lambert J, Cockcroft E, Thomas C, Clark C, Bryce C, Sussex J, Atherton H, Marriott C, Abel G. Exploring How Patients Are Supported to Use Online Services in Primary Care in England Through “Digital Facilitation”: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e56528 View
  55. Huettemann R, Sevov B, Meister S, Fehring L. How to establish digital health ecosystems from the perspective of health service-organizations: A taxonomy developed based on expert interviews conducted as modified Delphi approach. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  56. Abel G, Atherton H, Sussex J, Akter N, Aminu A, Bak W, Bryce C, Clark C, Cockcroft E, Evans H, Gkousis E, Jenkins G, Jenkinson C, Khan N, Lambert J, Leach B, Marriott C, Newbould J, Parkinson S, Parsons J, Pitchforth E, Sheard L, Stockwell S, Thomas C, Treadgold B, Winder R, Campbell J. Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study. Health and Social Care Delivery Research 2024:1 View