e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 405 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 91 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 79 JMIR Research Protocols
- 68 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 42 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 36 JMIR Serious Games
- 30 JMIR Formative Research
- 18 JMIR Human Factors
- 11 JMIRx Med
- 5 JMIR Cancer
- 4 JMIR Cardio
- 3 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 3 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 3 JMIR Mental Health
- 3 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 2 JMIR Aging
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
In a randomized control trial conducted by Liu et al [19], a respiratory rehabilitation program was shown to improve respiratory function, quality of life, and anxiety. These findings are reflected in another study where post–COVID-19 rehabilitation showed improvement in lung function and a reduction in anxiety levels [20].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e58436
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Cardiac rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary model of health care that consists of 4 phases. Phase I starts during in-hospital treatment and focusses on early mobilization. Phase II can either be performed as in-clinic or outpatient cardiac rehabilitation, depending on the availability of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation and the patient’s individual needs and preferences.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e57413
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Poststroke rehabilitation is primarily undertaken to enhance patient independence in activities of daily living (ADL). To achieve this goal, improving movement ability and exercise tolerance is important, which is directly reflected in the daily amount of activity. Increases in physical activity and extended rehabilitation time are associated with improved physical function and shorter hospital stays [1,2]. Higher levels of physical activity can decrease the mortality risk [3].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e63064
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Together, these challenges reveal a critical disconnect between current stroke rehabilitation interventions and more general guidance on BCT use [13]. Thus, this work focuses on resolving this disconnect by examining how BCTs should be prioritized for stroke rehabilitation with a multifaceted approach that distinguishes between motor rehabilitation (“general rehabilitation” in our terms) and psychosocial rehabilitation (addressed separately as “behavioral,” “cognitive,” and “emotional” aspects).
Interact J Med Res 2025;14:e59172
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In recent years, home-based VR training has emerged as a potential alternative for rehabilitation in patients with stroke [7,8]. VR technology enables patients to perform repetitive, task-specific movements in an engaging, interactive environment, potentially enhancing motor recovery, and improving adherence to rehabilitation protocols [9].
VR technology has garnered significant attention for its potential to enhance rehabilitation outcomes across various treatment environments.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69003
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Upper limb rehabilitation plays a critical role in restoring functional abilities in individuals with stroke or neurological injuries, enhancing their independence and autonomy [1,2]. Virtual reality (VR) technology has emerged as a promising tool in rehabilitation therapy, offering immersive and interactive features that can improve patient engagement and therapeutic outcomes [3-5].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e68149
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Thank you for your reading of our article “A 4-Week Mobile App–Based Telerehabilitation Program vs Conventional In-Person Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Sarcopenia: Randomized Controlled Trial” [1]. We are truly gratified that our study has garnered your attention and interest and has sparked meaningful discussion. In response to the points raised by the authors [2], our answers are as follows.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73174
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Dear Editor:
We are writing to share our thoughts on the article “A 4-Week Mobile App–Based Telerehabilitation Program vs Conventional In-Person Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Sarcopenia: Randomized Controlled Trial” [1] published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research. This research presents a significant exploration into the rehabilitation of older adults with sarcopenia, comparing a mobile app–based telerehabilitation approach with traditional in-person rehabilitation.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71845
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Rehabilitation is essential to maximize recovery after stroke [3]. Substantial evidence suggests that greater benefit is obtained by providing a greater intensity of rehabilitation [4]. Unfortunately, many patients complete their formal rehabilitation before recovery is complete [5]. When a patient is discharged home, maintaining a regimen of therapeutic exercise until recovery has plateaued is essential.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e64729
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Few studies emanating from West Africa explored digital rehabilitation for knee osteoarthritis. Odole and Ojo [28] implemented an in-home intervention of standardized exercise programs for patients with knee osteoarthritis, and adherence was monitored using telephone calls. The authors found that in-home telerehabilitation was comparable with clinic-based treatment in terms of improved Qo L.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e58393
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS