e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 18 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 10 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 2 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 Iproceedings
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Currently, a substantial number of gastrointestinal endoscopy-related videos have emerged on You Tube. However, there is a lack of research evaluating the quality of these videos.
The aim of the present study was to examine the quality, reliability, and recommendability of videos related to gastroscopy, colonoscopy, and capsule endoscopy available on You Tube.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e58855
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Systematic Review
Gastrointestinal endoscopy, a critical field for diagnosing and treating digestive diseases, stands on the cusp of significant advancements with the integration of these technologies. This, pivotal in diagnosing and treating digestive tract diseases, faces challenges like diagnostic variability and labor-intensive documentation.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e66648
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Considering China’s large population base and the significant burden on endoscopy resources, conducting large-scale 1-time endoscopic primary screening is not feasible. Guidelines recommend conducting high-risk assessments first to discern screeners with high risk for subsequent endoscopic screening in non–high-incidence areas. However, there exists an absence of long-term, high-quality evidence supporting this approach.
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e62864
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: Umbrella Review
Endoscopy, as an efficient and convenient method, can effectively diagnose various gastrointestinal diseases [2]. Endoscopic intervention can also effectively treat early gastrointestinal cancers [3].
In recent years, with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), numerous studies have been conducted to explore its application in the field of endoscopy, aiming to assist medical professionals in lesion identification and endoscopy quality control [4,5].
JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e56361
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The primary goal of screening endoscopy is to detect neoplastic lesions in the stomach. However, preneoplastic conditions, such as atrophy and IM, require regular monitoring to detect developing neoplastic lesions [5,6]. Evidence for the recommended screening endoscopy time interval is lacking; however, a shorter interval is generally recommended for patients with atrophy or IM compared to those without [5-7].
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e50448
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Based on the baseline colorectal polyp and adenoma distribution of our patients, we simulated the projected increase in all colonic lesions detected with the application of CADe and the corresponding changes in surveillance intervals, according to the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (USMSTF) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines [52,53].
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e42665
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
However, gastrointestinal endoscopy, the standard detection method for early gastric cancer, has an unsatisfactory sensitivity of 70% and is operator dependent [9]. Despite efforts to increase the detection rate, a valid screening method has yet to be developed [10,11]. The recent advancement in artificial intelligence (AI) systems, which provides highly accurate and efficient image recognition, may indicate a solution to this problem.
J Med Internet Res 2022;24(5):e27694
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Therefore, quality assurance is an essential part of colonoscopy screening programs, and the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/American College of Gastroenterology Task Force on Quality in Endoscopy has published indicators for colonoscopy to improve safety and quality [5].
JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(4):e35257
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
“capsule endoscopy”[tiab] OR “capsule endoscopy”[Mesh]: 5110
#3.
J Med Internet Res 2021;23(12):e33267
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS