Search Results (1 to 10 of 1439 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 561 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 168 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 149 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 142 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 85 JMIR Research Protocols
- 84 JMIR Formative Research
- 37 JMIR Serious Games
- 36 JMIR Aging
- 21 JMIR Human Factors
- 21 JMIR Medical Education
- 19 JMIR Mental Health
- 19 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 15 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 14 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 11 JMIR AI
- 11 JMIR Cancer
- 8 JMIR Infodemiology
- 6 Iproceedings
- 5 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 5 JMIR Dermatology
- 4 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 4 JMIR Cardio
- 4 JMIR Diabetes
- 3 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
For instance, Liu et al [22] assessed 29 different LLMs for generating impressions from radiological reports, using open-source datasets such as the MIMIC-CXR and Open I datasets. However, their study was limited to English x-ray reports and relied solely on automatic quantitative evaluation.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65547
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Statistical significance for differences between the control and intervention groups was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, such as age, and the chi-square test for the remaining categorical variables. A 2-sample z test for equality of proportions, with a continuity correction, was used to assess whether the differences in retention rates between the intervention and control groups were statistically significant.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67997
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Chi-square tests were used to compare the proportion of participants achieving clinically significant weight loss (≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% of baseline weight) between the engaged and nonengaged groups. In cases where small sample sizes or low expected frequencies were present (ie, n
To assess the time-to-event data for achieving clinically significant weight loss, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, comparing the time to reach ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% weight loss between the engaged and nonengaged groups.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69466
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
We conducted descriptive analysis and assessed evaluators’ preference ratios for Chat GPT using a chi-square goodness-of-fit test. A 2-tailed Welch t test was used to compare the mean values of the 2 responses. We defined a threshold score of 3 (acceptable) and calculated the proportion exceeding or falling below this threshold score (3), comparing them using prevalence ratios.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e62857
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS