Search Results (1 to 10 of 803 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 243 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 141 JMIR Research Protocols
- 80 JMIR Formative Research
- 75 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 36 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 34 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 29 JMIR Mental Health
- 22 JMIR Human Factors
- 22 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 16 JMIR Serious Games
- 14 JMIR Cancer
- 13 JMIR Medical Education
- 10 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 9 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 8 Iproceedings
- 8 JMIR Aging
- 8 JMIRx Med
- 7 JMIR Cardio
- 7 JMIR Diabetes
- 7 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 3 JMIR Dermatology
- 2 JMIR AI
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR Infodemiology
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 2 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
For usability testing, participants completed the 30-item USE questionnaire [65] which contains 4 subscales assessing usefulness (eg, “It helps me be more effective”), ease of use (eg, “It is easy to use”), ease of learning (eg, “I learned to use it quickly”), and satisfaction (eg, “I am satisfied with it”) on an 8-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 8=strongly agree).
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e65188
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Sample items include “I think that I would like to use bhoos frequently” and “I thought bhoos was easy to use.” Responses to each item range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Possible scores on the SUS range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating higher overall usability of a system or program. The SUS has been used in roughly 3500 surveys within 273 studies evaluating a range of systems, interfaces, and programs [37]. Internal consistency of the SUS was good (α=0.84).
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e69873
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For the evaluation of the content of the app and the theoretical model of Sohlberg and Mateer [9] regarding attention and that of Baer et al [29] regarding mindfulness by experts, a Likert-type scale was used with 4 possible responses: 1, I totally disagree; 2, I somewhat disagree; 3, I somewhat agree; and 4, I totally agree. For this analysis, the content validity index (CVI) was calculated from the count of the responses “I somewhat agree” and “I totally agree” divided by the total number of experts.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e64174
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Although applying physical changes such as standing desks may be a solution to break up sitting time at work, it appears to be a less feasible strategy in the home office context due to the expensive cost for the companies:
I’m a big advocate of standing desks, standing workstations in terms of being effective but I appreciate that in this situation it’s probably not feasible for them to be incorporated in the home-office.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e59405
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Extended Reality (XR) in Pediatric Acute and Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Evidence Gap Map
patient and clinician voices in developing tools to address pain related school impairment: a phase I
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e63854
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Participants will be excluded from the study if they are not affiliated with the El Paso United States–Mexico border region, have not previously participated in phases I or II of the larger parent research project, do not identify as a current or emerging health care provider, decline or are unable to participate in the full intervention and follow-up time points, or are unable to complete participation and activities in the English language.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60790
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section