Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 10 of 2125 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Extended Reality–Enhanced Mental Health Consultation Training: Quantitative Evaluation Study

Extended Reality–Enhanced Mental Health Consultation Training: Quantitative Evaluation Study

(A) Wireframe of the patient avatar, Stacey; (B) Soundboard for instructors to control Stacey’s responses; (C) Setting for the consultation, showing the learner (blue) and the patient avatar. During the simulation, learners interacted with Stacey by asking questions that were either processed by conversational artificial intelligence (AI) or directly controlled by the instructor for tailored responses.

Katherine Hiley, Zanib Bi-Mohammad, Luke Taylor, Rebecca Burgess-Dawson, Dominic Patterson, Devon Puttick-Whiteman, Christopher Gay, Janette Hiscoe, Chris Munsch, Sally Richardson, Mark Knowles-Lee, Celia Beecham, Neil Ralph, Arunangsu Chatterjee, Ryan Mathew, Faisal Mushtaq

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e64619

Large Language Model Applications for Health Information Extraction in Oncology: Scoping Review

Large Language Model Applications for Health Information Extraction in Oncology: Scoping Review

Number of studies that evaluated (A) fine-tuning and (B) prompt engineering methodologies to optimize large language model data extraction performance. Our scoping review of 24 studies highlights significant research interest in designing, evaluating, and deploying LLMs for data extraction from clinical text in oncology. The most commonly used LLMs for data extraction from clinical text in oncology include BERT and Chat-GPT, two of the most well-known LLMs in NLP research.

David Chen, Saif Addeen Alnassar, Kate Elizabeth Avison, Ryan S Huang, Srinivas Raman

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e65984

Accuracy of Smartphone-Mediated Snore Detection in a Simulated Real-World Setting: Algorithm Development and Validation

Accuracy of Smartphone-Mediated Snore Detection in a Simulated Real-World Setting: Algorithm Development and Validation

Analytical validation reference table showing the schematic and equationsa,b,c,d,e used to report snore detection performance of the Sleep Watch app in this study. a Accuracy = (true positive + true negative)/(true positive + true negative + false positive + false negative). b Sensitivity = true positive/(true positive + false negative). c Specificity = true negative/(false positive + true negative). d Positive predictive value = true positive/(true positive + false positive). e Negative predictive value = true negative

Jeffrey Brown, Zachary Mitchell, Yu Albert Jiang, Ryan Archdeacon

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67861

Mobile Health Tool to Capture Social Determinants of Health and Their Impact on HIV Treatment Outcomes Among People Who Use Drugs: Pilot Feasibility Study

Mobile Health Tool to Capture Social Determinants of Health and Their Impact on HIV Treatment Outcomes Among People Who Use Drugs: Pilot Feasibility Study

These technologies may be particularly well-suited to augment existing patient-centered, comprehensive models of HIV care that are enabled by federal Ryan White funding in the United States [19], as these care models already feature medical case management, food pantries, support to obtain housing, and other services to address social determinants of health.

Rachel E Gicquelais, Caitlin Conway, Olivia Vjorn, Andrew Genz, Gregory Kirk, Ryan Westergaard

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59953

Evaluating the Effect of the JUUL2 System With 5 Flavors on Cigarette Smoking and Tobacco Product Use Behaviors Among Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes: 6-Week Actual Use Study

Evaluating the Effect of the JUUL2 System With 5 Flavors on Cigarette Smoking and Tobacco Product Use Behaviors Among Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes: 6-Week Actual Use Study

(A) Number of days used JUUL2 in past 7 days; (B) number of times used JUUL2 per day; and (C) number of JUUL2 puffs per day. The incidence of study-emergent AEs was low for each of the 5 JUUL2 products during the 6-week actual use period—in each group less than 2.5% of participants reported an AE (Virginia Tobacco, 1/262, 0.4%; for, Autumn Tobacco, 2/237, 0.8%, Polar Menthol, 2/262, 0.8%, Ruby Menthol 2/234, 0.9%, for Summer Menthol, 6/249, 2.4%; Multimedia Appendices 16 and 17).

Nicholas I Goldenson, Saul Shiffman, Mark A Sembower, Arielle Selya, Steve Pype, Ryan A Black

Interact J Med Res 2025;14:e60620