Published on in Vol 9, No 1 (2021): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/22753, first published .
A Low-Cost, Ear-Contactless Electronic Stethoscope Powered by Raspberry Pi for Auscultation of Patients With COVID-19: Prototype Development and Feasibility Study

A Low-Cost, Ear-Contactless Electronic Stethoscope Powered by Raspberry Pi for Auscultation of Patients With COVID-19: Prototype Development and Feasibility Study

A Low-Cost, Ear-Contactless Electronic Stethoscope Powered by Raspberry Pi for Auscultation of Patients With COVID-19: Prototype Development and Feasibility Study

Original Paper

1Department of Cardiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

2Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

3Sewickley Academy Senior High School, Pittsburgh, PA, United States

4School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

5Department of Cardiac Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Corresponding Author:

Wenyue Pang, MD, PhD

Department of Cardiology

Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University

36 Sanhao Street

Shenyang, 110004

China

Phone: 86 18940258063

Email: pangwy@sj-hospital.org


Background: Chest examination by auscultation is essential in patients with COVID-19, especially those with poor respiratory conditions, such as severe pneumonia and respiratory dysfunction, and intensive cases who are intubated and whose breathing is assisted with a ventilator. However, proper auscultation of these patients is difficult when medical workers wear personal protective equipment and when it is necessary to minimize contact with patients.

Objective: The objective of our study was to design and develop a low-cost electronic stethoscope enabling ear-contactless auscultation and digital storage of data for further analysis. The clinical feasibility of our device was assessed in comparison to a standard electronic stethoscope.

Methods: We developed a prototype of the ear-contactless electronic stethoscope, called Auscul Pi, powered by Raspberry Pi and Python. Our device enables real-time capture of auscultation sounds with a microspeaker instead of an earpiece, and it can store data files for later analysis. We assessed the feasibility of using this stethoscope by detecting abnormal heart and respiratory sounds from 8 patients with heart failure or structural heart diseases and from 2 healthy volunteers and by comparing the results with those from a 3M Littmann electronic stethoscope.

Results: We were able to conveniently operate Auscul Pi and precisely record the patients’ auscultation sounds. Auscul Pi showed similar real-time recording and playback performance to the Littmann stethoscope. The phonocardiograms of data obtained with the two stethoscopes were consistent and could be aligned with the cardiac cycles of the corresponding electrocardiograms. Pearson correlation analysis of amplitude data from the two types of phonocardiograms showed that Auscul Pi was correlated with the Littmann stethoscope with coefficients of 0.3245-0.5570 for healthy participants (P<.001) and of 0.3449-0.5138 among 4 patients (P<.001).

Conclusions: Auscul Pi can be used for auscultation in clinical practice by applying real-time ear-contactless playback followed by quantitative analysis. Auscul Pi may allow accurate auscultation when medical workers are wearing protective suits and have difficulties in examining patients with COVID-19.

Trial Registration: ChiCTR.org.cn ChiCTR2000033830; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=54971.

JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(1):e22753

doi:10.2196/22753

Keywords



Since the outbreak of COVID-19, increasing numbers of physicians and nurses have been treating patients on the front lines worldwide. Many health care workers have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 at work, and some of them have become infected with the virus due to high rates of nosocomial transmission [1-5]. Many medical professionals have emphasized the importance of safety measures during the management of critical patients [5,6].

The stethoscope is a useful instrument for physicians, nurses, anesthetists, and other health professionals who examine, diagnose, and evaluate the respiratory status of patients with COVID-19. Nearly all critically ill patients with COVID-19 present severe and acute respiratory conditions [7]. Auscultation is important for these patients, particularly those with severe pneumonia or respiratory dysfunction and those who are intubated and whose breathing is assisted with a ventilator, to ensure accurate diagnosis and to assess disease severity and treatment efficacy [8,9]. In addition, auscultation has been shown to act as an emotional bridge between health staff and patients, who are isolated and separated from their loved ones [10].

However, some researchers have found that stethoscopes can spread infection between patients and health care professionals [11,12] and that stethoscopes are not cleaned sufficiently often by medical staff [13]. As a consequence, the safety of stethoscope implementation for chest auscultation during the COVID-19 pandemic has been questioned [14]. Furthermore, inside the quarantine wards in hospitals, medical staff wearing protective clothing are unable to use conventional stethoscopes because their protective clothing covers their ears [9,15] (Figure 1). As a safer alternative, some experts have suggested using stethoscopes less frequently and ultrasound more frequently [16], while other experts have stressed the necessity of stethoscope use and auscultation in COVID-19 treatment [9].

Figure 1. A medical staff member nursing a patient with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. The staff member’s protective clothing prevents the use of a conventional stethoscope.
View this figure

Electronic stethoscopes can transmit auscultation sounds via Bluetooth and enable users to store and replay the sounds through a personal computer or other device. For example, the Littmann 3200 electronic stethoscope (3M) has higher sensitivity and specificity than classic acoustic stethoscopes for diagnosis of patients with heart vascular disease [17]. Although an electronic stethoscope possesses these benefits, it still requires contact listening via the ears of medical staff, which is unsafe when working with patients with COVID-19. Furthermore, electronic stethoscopes are expensive, with prices greater than US $350, which limits their use in low-resource settings. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many medical facilities encountered a critical care crisis due to their limited medical capacity, shortages of personnel [18-20], and shortages and increasing cost of health care products, including ventilators and other medical devices [21,22].

Some manufacturers and researchers have integrated stethoscopes with smartphones, such as the Eko Core Digital Stethoscope (Eko Devices) [23]. However, this type of stethoscope can only transfer the auscultation data to a smartphone, tablet, or a personal computer; therefore, real-time playback to other medical staff is difficult. Furthermore, the smartphone is inconvenient for use in an intensive care unit (ICU) for COVID-19. One proposed solution is to capture and analyze heart sounds using only a smartphone [24]. In that study, researchers recorded normal and pathological heart sounds using three different smartphones, and diagnosis was performed using machine learning. However, the device and procedure were designed for intelligent diagnosis and not for application during management of patients with COVID-19, in addition to the abovementioned difficulties of using the smartphone in an isolated ICU. Stethoscopes and devices on the market or published in the literature require ear contact, which is not feasible for staff wearing personal protective equipment.

As medical staff participating in the frontline treatment of patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, our team realized the need for a stethoscope that did not require ear contact for auscultation. Here, we describe the design and development of an electronic stethoscope (Auscul Pi) based on a low-cost, single-board computer the size of a credit card (Raspberry Pi) for ear-contactless recording and archiving of auscultation results. We explored the usability and advantages of the new stethoscope in an exploratory sample of patients and healthy volunteers in comparison with the Littmann 3200 electronic stethoscope.


Development

Design

The Auscul Pi electronic stethoscope protype was designed and developed using Raspberry Pi hardware (Raspberry Pi Foundation), the open-source Python programming language, and other modified components. We evaluated the prototype for use with patients with COVID-19 in terms of seven dimensions: disinfectability, ease of use, safety for patients and health professionals, auscultation performance, affordability, digitalization, and compatibility with the wearing of a personal protective suit. The prototype was compared with a conventional stethoscope and a Littmann digital stethoscope (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Flowchart of Auscul Pi design based on the evaluation of 7 dimensions in comparison with a conventional stethoscope and 3M Littmann digital stethoscope. Thick solid arrows indicate that the stethoscope performed satisfactorily on the indicated dimension; dashed arrows indicate that it did not.
View this figure
Hardware

Raspberry Pi computers were developed by the Raspberry Pi Foundation in 2009 with the original purpose of computer science education [25]. This small single-board computer (up to the size of a credit card) consists of system-on-a-chip hardware, including a quad-core ARM processor (ARM Holdings), 1 GB of memory, and a graphic processing unit. Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Ethernet and other modules are also built into the computers. The components we used for this project, all of which are generic and can easily be purchased on the web, are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Components of the Auscul Pi digital stethoscope.
ItemModelManufacturerQuantityPrice in ¥ (Price in US $)a,b
Raspberry Pi3 Model B+Raspberry Pi Foundation1280 (39.27)
MicroSDc card64GSanDisk159 (8.27)
Micro USB power supplyN/AMingXing15.88 (0.82)
UPSd battery expansion board5-volt outputYDSM1132 (18.51)
18650 rechargeable batteriesINR19860-30Q 3000MAYDSM248 (6.73)
MicrophoneUSB collar microphoneQianBaiXiang129 (4.07)
SpeakerInserted microspeakerYayusi156.9 (7.98)
Touch screen3.5-inch touch screenMumu159 (8.25)

aBased on an exchange rate of 7.13 RMB=US $1.

bTotal cost: ¥669.78 (US $93.90)

cSD: secure digital.

dUPS: uninterruptible power supply.

We installed the operating system on the Raspberry Pi and initiated it [26], then connected the components mentioned in Table 1. Raspberry Pi can potentially use any type of sensor to record data and transfer it to the software program. We used an ordinary USB collar microphone as a transducer from the modified chest piece of a stethoscope to collect sound wave signals and transform them to electronic signals via USB port. Then, the Python-coded program (Auscul Pi Console) received the digital information, processed it, and sent it back to the microspeaker. Figure 3 illustrates the connections of each component and the Raspberry Pi computer.

Figure 3. Schematic of the connections within the Auscul Pi system. (A) Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+. (B) Microspeaker. (C) USB collar microphone. (D) Uninterruptible power supply battery expansion board with two rechargeable batteries (18650). (E) 3.5-inch touch screen. (F) Chest piece from a conventional stethoscope. CPU: central processing unit.
View this figure

Because the goal was to design an electronic stethoscope for use in a quarantine zone or ICU, it was necessary for its operation to be as simple as possible. We added a touch screen to initiate the auscultation and allow playback of the recorded sound. Figure 4 shows an image of the components of the Auscul Pi device.

Figure 4. The Auscul Pi prototype. (A) The uninterruptible power supply. (B) The Raspberry Pi system (left) and uninterruptible power supply (right). (C) Combination of the Raspberry Pi and the power supply. (D) A microphone connected to the chest piece from a conventional stethoscope, 3.5-inch touch screen, Raspberry Pi with power supply, and microspeaker. (E) Fully assembled device containing the components in D.
View this figure
Software

We used the Python programming language to code our software. Python is one of the most popular programming languages [27], not only because of its simplicity, excellent readability, and powerful functionality, but also because third-party professionals from diverse fields are using it to develop new packages and modules, which are uploaded to a shared repository called the Python package index [28]. Thus, Python is a “glue language” that can join different packages and modules together to construct code with desired functions.

The PyAudio package is a third-party package developed for audio processing [29]. It can be downloaded from the GitHub repository [30] or installed by a Linux command (Multimedia Appendix 1). After importing PyAudio and other packages, we wrote our code. Our application program, Auscul Pi Console, was run on Raspberry Pi in a graphical user interface (GUI) using tkinter [31]. When the Auscul Pi Console runs, the auscultation sound can be played and heard via the microspeaker. The program generates a Waveform Audio File Format sound file (.wav) and digital NumPy array file (.npy) [32] bearing the date and time of the measurement (Figure 5).

Figure 5. (A) Digital NumPy files (.npy) and (B) Waveform Audio File Format files (.wav) generated by Auscul Pi. The file names indicate the date and time of each measurement.
View this figure

Finally, we converted the Python code file AusculPiConsole.py to frozen binary code using PyInstaller [33] (Multimedia Appendix 2). This process enabled the program to be run on another Raspberry Pi simply by double-tapping the icon, without the need for a Python interpreter. The entire source code of the Auscul Pi Console is available at our GitHub repository [34] and in Multimedia Appendix 3, and it can be reused according to the terms of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology License.

This touch screen provides a GUI to activate the auscultation process. The “Auscultate” button is pushed, which initiates a 30-second recording and simultaneous broadcast of the auscultation. The last recorded auscultation can be played back by pressing the “Replay” button (Figure 6). The Auscul Pi Console program interface is user-friendly and can be operated interactively. All health care users in the present study were able to begin using the prototype quickly and were able to use it without touching the study participants.

Figure 6. The graphical user interface on the touch screen of Auscul Pi. (A) The desktop display. The user can double-tap the Auscul Pi icon to run the program. The recorded data are stored in the AudioData folder. (B) The manipulation interface of the Auscul Pi Console after double-tapping the Auscul Pi Console icon. The user can control the auscultation and replay by tapping the “Auscultate” and “Replay” buttons, respectively.
View this figure
Data Storage and Communication

The audio files and digital array files can be shared and transferred through a Wi-Fi signal for further study and analysis. For instance, we used Virtual Network Computing Viewer [35] or PuTTY terminal [36] to transfer the generated files to a personal computer. A phonocardiogram (PCG) records the occurrence of heart sounds in the cardiac cycle generated from the mechanical activity of the heart [37]. Our prototype includes a Python-coded parser program, which is also provided in our GitHub repository [38], that plots a PCG based on the auscultation data in the digital NumPy array file (.npy). PCG were generated from the Littmann stethoscope data using StethAssist software (3M).

Clinical Study

After the installation of the hardware and the software, we applied this portable device in a pilot clinical study, which was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (approval No. 2020PS525K); however, no application has been filed for commercial use to the regulatory agencies. Our pilot study (ChiCTR.org.cn Identifier ChiCTR2000033830) aimed to investigate the usability and advantages of Auscul Pi in comparison with the 3M Littmann 3200 electronic stethoscope. To assess the auscultation performance of heart sounds and respiratory sounds with Auscul Pi, we included eight patients with structural heart disease or heart failure and two healthy volunteers, who were examined face-to-face with the device in the clinic or inpatient department. None of the participants had been diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients and volunteers gave written informed consent in this study.

Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure, from whom rale sounds, including moist crackles and wheezes, could be heard in lung auscultation; (2) patients with any type of structural heart disease, such as congenital heart disease or valvular heart disease, from which murmurs could be heard. Patients were excluded if they had weak heart sounds caused by pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, or pneumothorax. Two healthy volunteers were also included in the study.

We divided the participants into three groups according to the inclusion criteria: (1) the respiratory sound group (rale group) contained patients with heart failure; (2) the heart sound group (murmur group) contained patients with structural heart disease; and (3) the healthy group (normal respiratory sound and heart sound group) contained healthy volunteers. The auscultation procedure was different for each group. To collect respiratory sound from the patients with heart failure in the rale group, we auscultated their left and right lungs in the regions of the 7th to 9th intercostal space (7ICS to 9ICS) along the midaxillary line. We first performed auscultation with Auscul Pi by pressing the “Auscultate” button on the touch screen to initiate the 30-second recording and broadcast. We checked the respiratory sounds from the microspeaker without ear contact. During that time, we assessed whether we could clearly hear moist crackles or wheezes at the bedside. Then, we repeated the procedure using the Littmann stethoscope.

Before auscultation of patients with structural heart diseases in the murmur group, we checked the echocardiogram to locate the main origin of the murmur; then, we focused on the corresponding site for auscultation. For example, the echocardiogram of one patient with valvular heart disease showed mild mitral regurgitation. Therefore, we auscultated at the apex site, located around the 5ICS in the midclavicular line, to hear the loudest murmurs from the mitral valve. In one patient with congenital heart disease, the echocardiogram showed a ventricular septal defect. We auscultated in the 3rd intercostal space (3ICS) and 4th intercostal space (4ICS) to the left border of the sternum to hear the loudest murmurs. We listened carefully to the output from the microspeaker of the Auscul Pi to assess the presence and clearness of the murmurs. Next, we checked healthy volunteers with both stethoscopes to evaluate normal heart sounds and respiratory sounds.

After auscultation, we transferred the data from the two stethoscopes onto a personal computer via Wi-Fi (Auscul Pi) or Bluetooth (Littmann 3200). First, we listened to the sound files (.wav) from both stethoscopes and compared the respiratory and heart sounds and their quality. Second, we compared the PCGs generated from each stethoscope with each other and with the electrocardiograms (ECGs) showing the cardiac cycles. To quantify the consistency of the two PCGs, we evaluated the relationship of the waveforms between the Auscul Pi and the Littmann stethoscope by assessing whether they had similar simultaneous ups and downs in the waveform and whether they showed similar S1, S2, and murmur timings.

For the analysis of respiratory sound auscultation, we used the audio data collected from the patients with heart failure, and we listened to the audio file from our Auscul Pi stethoscope to evaluate the consistency with the results obtained from the 3M Littmann stethoscope. For the heart sound auscultation analysis, in addition to listening to the audio, three physicians (WZ, XZ, and SG) compared the PCGs plotted from the digital array files from each stethoscope for the morphologies of the waveforms. Furthermore, a Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess the consistency of the results obtained with the two stethoscopes. We first processed the PCG data by extracting the wave amplitude values at every time point as a data series. Then, the correlation between the two data series was implemented to evaluate the peak and trough synchronizations of S1, S2, and murmurs using Python code, and we also provided the source code in our GitHub repository [39].


Development

Auscul Pi is modular to enable construction of the entire device in a short time. We required 4 weeks to design, purchase, and assemble the hardware and code, debug, and optimize the software of Auscul Pi after we had the initial idea. Due to the size (10 cm × 6 cm × 5 cm) and light weight, the Auscul Pi can be carried with a single hand, while the other hand holds the chest piece of the stethoscope for auscultation. The standby time of the batteries was 2.5 hours during the auscultation examination, and the batteries could be fully recharged in 2 hours via the mini-USB port on the uninterruptible power supply extension board. We found that we could operate it conveniently and record the information precisely in our clinical practice when considering the aspects of ergonomics and information technology.

To make data-based decisions about the prototype design, we evaluated the performance of the Auscul Pi based on the seven dimensions mentioned in the Methods. We used a scoring system with 5 levels of satisfaction, each of which was each scored from 1-5, with 5 being the strongest score (most satisfactory) and 1 being the weakest score (least satisfactory). The evaluators were WZ, XZ, and SG, who gave the scores. All scores were weighted by importance to obtain the total scores. The total score of Auscul Pi was 104, which was higher than that of the conventional stethoscope (87) and the 3M Littmann stethoscope (82) (Table 2).

Table 2. Engineering design matrix showing the importance and satisfaction scores of various dimensions of the stethoscopes from 1-5 (1, weakest; 5, strongest).
DimensionImportanceSatisfaction scoresa
Conventional stethoscope3M Littman digital stethoscopeAuscul Pi digital stethoscope
Size2543
Disinfectability3543
Ease of use3543
Affordability3534
Digitalization3135
Safety for patients4222
Safety for health professionals4114
Ability to detect auscultation sound3453
Usability in isolation in the intensive care unit5114
Total scoreN/Ab8782104

aSatisfaction scores are weighted by importance.

bN/A: not applicable.

Clinical Study

This pilot study included eight patients and two healthy volunteers (Table 3). No patient was excluded from the study. First, we auscultated the two healthy volunteers to acquire normal heart sounds (Multimedia Appendix 4, Multimedia Appendix 5) and normal respiratory sounds (Multimedia Appendix 6, Multimedia Appendix 7). The audio of the respiratory and heart sounds obtained with Auscul Pi was clear and recognizable in both real-time play and the recorded archives. The digital NumPy array files of the corresponding sounds were used to plot the PCGs (Figure 7). The audio and PCGs generated by Auscul Pi were consistent with those obtained from the 3M Littmann stethoscope by the evaluations of the three physicians mentioned in the Methods section. To quantify the consistency of the two PCGs, we evaluated the relationship of the waveforms between the Auscul Pi and 3M Littmann stethoscopes by assessing whether they had similar peaks and valleys in the waveforms simultaneously, especially whether they had good synchronization of the first heart sound, second heart sound, and murmur timings. We firstly processed the PCG data by extracting the wave amplitude values of every time point. Then, we performed the Pearson correlation of the 2 data series, also with Python [39] (Multimedia Appendix 8). For the two healthy volunteers, the data for volunteer 9 had a correlation coefficient of 0.5570 (P<.001), and the correlation coefficient for volunteer 10 was 0.3245 (P<.001).

Table 3. Demographic characteristics of the patients and volunteers in the pilot study.
NumberSexAge (years)GroupDiagnosis 1Diagnosis 2Auscultation siteAbnormalities
1Male64Respiratory soundHeart failureAtrial fibrillation7ICSa-9ICS along the midaxillary lineWheezes
2Male79Respiratory soundHeart failureAtrial fibrillation7ICS-9ICS along the midaxillary lineMoist crackles
3Male43Respiratory soundHeart failureIschemic cardiomyopathy7ICS-9ICS along the midaxillary lineMoist crackles
4Male66Respiratory soundHeart failureAtrial fibrillation7ICS-9ICS along the midaxillary lineMoist crackles
5Male68Heart soundValvular heart diseaseMitral regurgitationApex (5ICS in the midclavicular line)Mild holosystolic murmurs
6Female72Heart soundValvular heart diseaseAortic stenosis2ICS to the right border of the sternumMild holosystolic murmurs
7Male69Heart soundValvular heart diseaseAortic stenosis2ICS to the right border of the sternumMild holosystolic murmurs
8Male4Heart soundCongenital heart diseaseVentricular septal defect3ICS and 4ICS to the left border of the sternumLoud holosystolic murmurs
9Male40HealthyN/AbN/AApex (5ICS in the midclavicular line) None
10Male22HealthyN/AN/AApex (5ICS in the midclavicular line) None

aICS: intercostal space.

bN/A: not applicable.

Figure 7. Electrocardiogram and phonocardiograms of healthy volunteer 9 generated by the 3M Littmann stethoscope and Auscul Pi, showing normal sinus rhythms and normal heart sounds. ECG, electrocardiogram: S1: first heart sound; S2: second heart sound.
View this figure

In the respiratory sound group (patients 1-4), all patients initially complained of dyspnea when presented at the hospital, and we heard rales in all patients. All these patients received anti-heart failure therapies. They all recovered and were discharged several days later. Patient 1 presented with atrial fibrillation and heart failure. At the beginning of the treatment period, we performed auscultation on this patient with both stethoscopes. We could hear clear wheezes in both the inspiratory and expiratory phases. During the examination, we checked the respiratory sounds simultaneously played by the microspeaker, from which the wheezes were clear and obvious. Then, we replayed the wheezing sounds in the computer when away from the patient, and the wheeze sound quality and recognizability were better than those obtained when we broadcast the sound during recording (Multimedia Appendix 9). The quality of the respiratory sounds was good for the other three patients in the group (patients 2-4) during playback of the recording.

For the patients in the heart sound group (patients 5-8), we examined and easily detected the murmurs at the corresponding auscultation sites of the culprit valves or defects. For example, patient 8, who was suffering from congenital heart disease, had two intraventricular septal defects. When we auscultated him at 3ICS and 4ICS to the left border of the sternum, a loud holosystolic murmur was clearly detected with Auscul Pi (Multimedia Appendix 10). The acoustic characteristics and timings of the murmurs were quite similar to the murmurs heard with the Littmann stethoscope (Multimedia Appendix 11). This patient underwent surgical ventricular septal repair. Postsurgery auscultation with the Auscul Pi (Multimedia Appendix 12) and Littmann stethoscope (Multimedia Appendix 13) stethoscopes showed that the murmurs had disappeared.

The alignments of the PCGs with the ECGs showed good visual consistency between Auscul Pi and the 3M Littmann stethoscope (Figure 8). We also performed the same correlation analysis to evaluate the consistency of the data series extracted from the PCG NumPy data. The correlation coefficient of the Auscul Pi and 3M Littmann results before surgery was 0.3436 (P<.001), and the coefficient after surgery was 0.5138 (P<0.001). The correlation coefficients of the other 3 patients ranged from 0.3449-0.4797 (P<.001) (Table 4).

Figure 8. Electrocardiograms and phonocardiograms of patient 8, showing systolic murmurs before cardiac surgery to treat a ventricular septal defect but no murmurs after surgery. ECG: electrocardiogram; m: murmur; S1: first heart sound; S2: second heart sound.
View this figure
Table 4. Pearson correlation coefficients between phonograms obtained using the Auscul Pi and 3M Littmann stethoscopes (all P values <.001).
Patient or volunteerCorrelation coefficient
90.5570
100.3245
50.3449
60.4797
70.4134
8 (presurgery)0.3436
8 (postsurgery)0.5138

Principal Results

In this work, we present the development of Auscul Pi, an innovative electronic stethoscope that we evaluated in a pilot study in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Our results show that Auscul Pi can be applied for the examination of cardiovascular diseases, as it clearly plays and records heart and respiratory sounds. The consistency between the results obtained by Auscul Pi and a typical electronic stethoscope was dependable based on qualitative analysis of the audio files and statistical analysis of the PCGs.

Our team found that Auscul Pi had several advantages over traditional stethoscopes in clinical practice. First, the contactless design of the stethoscope allowed no contact with the ears of the medical staff. The device can be used by physicians and nurses wearing a protective suit, eye protector, and face shield when auscultation is essential in clinical work, such as treating patients with COVID-19. The stethoscope can reproduce respiratory and heart sounds with the microspeaker, enabling nearby medical staff to hear the broadcast as well as if they were touching their ear to a stethoscope earpiece.

Second, the components are inexpensive, and component assembly and software installation are relatively easy; therefore, the do-it-yourself protocol can be followed by medical staff in a short time. The cost of the entire device is approximately US $94, of which $35 correspond to the Raspberry Pi; this is much lower than the price of a 3M Littman stethoscope. Therefore, the device is accessible to most medical facilities, hospitals, and emergency rooms worldwide. Additionally, Raspberry Pi is a popular project worldwide. It can be easily ordered on the web, and due to its small size, fast shipment is possible.

Third, in addition to its low cost, Raspberry Pi has versatility for application in many medical projects, ranging from assistance with medical imaging [40] to cervical cancer prevention [41], building computational microscopy [42], and ventilator buildup during the COVID-19 pandemic [42,43]. Moreover, Raspberry Pi uses Linux as a routine operating system, which is open-source, generic, and freely downloadable. Additionally, many software packages developed by third-party developers use Python, which is one of the most popular programming languages and works well with Raspberry Pi.

Fourth, the recorded respiratory and heart sound data can be stored in the Raspberry Pi, then transferred to a personal computer for further analysis if the hospital, emergency department, ICU, or ward has a Wi-Fi signal.

Finally, Auscul Pi can quantify and visualize auscultation: the system simultaneously records and broadcasts the signal, and the resulting computer files can be transferred using Wi-Fi for offline analysis. PCGs can also be plotted based on the NumPy array files for ease of visualization and analysis. These data can also be used in the future for research related to diagnosis and prognosis, such as use of machine learning algorithms [24,44]. The device may also have educational value as a teaching aid for medical students.

While treating patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, we developed the Auscul Pi to solve the problems of auscultation. In a long-term perspective, this innovation may not be limited to the examination of patients with COVID-19, and it may be applied to other infectious diseases to reduce the risk of infection of medical workers. Although we do not envisage that Auscul Pi will become a commercial medical product in a large market, we believe it may inspire biomedical engineers, bioinformatics researchers, clinicians, and computer scientists to create low-cost engineering technologies to benefit patients who have been severely affected by COVID-19. Low-cost portable medical devices based on Raspberry Pi and the Python programming language may even become useful as tools for self-monitoring and assessment by patients with COVID-19 under quarantine [45], especially in low-resource areas.

Limitations

The auscultation sounds recorded and broadcast by Auscul Pi inevitably contain some noises due to background and electricity, such as tiny click and pop sounds, that nevertheless do not cover up the main auscultation sounds. Future work should focus on filtering out much or all of this background noise. Our clinical research was a small pilot study to explore the feasibility of using the device in patients; however, we have planned a randomized clinical trial involving more medical professionals as device users and more patients with auscultatory abnormalities. We will also use questionnaires and unstructured interviews to ask the professionals about the usability and reliability of the device.

Conclusions

A low-cost electronic stethoscope device, Auscul Pi, enables auscultation without ear contact. The device enables real-time broadcast of auscultation sounds and simultaneous digital data storage for offline analysis. Auscul Pi may enable accurate auscultation of patients with COVID-19 by medical workers wearing protective suits, thereby helping to minimize risk of infection.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the program of Scientific Research Projects for Prevention and Control of COVID-19 of China Medical University. The funding source was involved in electronic component purchase, data collection, and data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The hardware portion (Auscul Pi) and the software portion (Auscul Pi Console) of this project were developed by CY and ZP, both of whom have filed a patent (202021055264.4) through Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University.

Multimedia Appendix 1

PyAudio installation.

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 119 KB

Multimedia Appendix 2

Conversion of the Python code to frozen binary code.

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 80 KB

Multimedia Appendix 3

Source code of Auscul Pi Console.

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 106 KB

Multimedia Appendix 4

Heart sounds of healthy volunteer 9 recorded with Auscul Pi.

MP4 File (MP4 Video), 180 KB

Multimedia Appendix 5

Heart sounds of healthy volunteer 9 recorded with the 3M Littmann stethoscope.

MP4 File (MP4 Video), 119 KB

Multimedia Appendix 6

Respiratory sounds of healthy volunteer 9 recorded with the Auscul Pi.

MP4 File (MP4 Video), 214 KB

Multimedia Appendix 7

Respiratory sounds of healthy volunteer 9 recorded with the 3M Littmann stethoscope.

MP4 File (MP4 Video), 115 KB

Multimedia Appendix 8

The source code of the phonocardiogram processing and the correlation analysis.

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 125 KB

Multimedia Appendix 9

Respiratory sounds of patient 1 with heart failure patient recorded by Auscul Pi. Clear wheezes were heard.

MP4 File (MP4 Video), 464 KB

Multimedia Appendix 10

Heart sounds of patient 8 with congenital heart disease (ventricular septal defect) before surgery recorded by Auscul Pi. Loud holosystolic murmurs can be heard.

MP4 File (MP4 Video), 172 KB

Multimedia Appendix 11

Heart sounds of patient 8 before surgery by the 3M Littmann stethoscope. The murmurs can also be heard.

MP4 File (MP4 Video), 61 KB

Multimedia Appendix 12

Heart sounds of patient 8 after surgery recorded by Auscul Pi. The murmurs have disappeared.

MP4 File (MP4 Video), 122 KB

Multimedia Appendix 13

Heart sounds of patient 8 after surgery recorded by the 3M Littmann stethoscope. The murmurs have disappeared.

MP4 File (MP4 Video), 159 KB

  1. Chu J, Yang N, Wei Y, Yue H, Zhang F, Zhao J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 54 medical staff with COVID-19: A retrospective study in a single center in Wuhan, China. J Med Virol 2020 Jul 29;92(7):807-813 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Haseltine WA. 19% Of People Infected With COVID In The US Are Healthcare Professionals. Almost Three Quarters Of Them Are Women. Forbes. 2020 Apr 15.   URL: https:/​/www.​forbes.com/​sites/​williamhaseltine/​2020/​04/​15/​19-of-people-infected-with-covid-in-the-us-are-healthcare-professionals-almost-three-quarters-of-them-are-women/​?sh=51a4b514588e [accessed 2020-05-16]
  3. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020 Apr 07;323(13):1239-1242. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Harrington RA, Elkind MSV, Benjamin IJ. Protecting Medical Trainees on the COVID-19 Frontlines Saves Us All. Circulation 2020 May 05;141(18):e775-e777 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Cheung JC, Ho LT, Cheng JV, Cham EYK, Lam KN. Staff safety during emergency airway management for COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Lancet Respir Med 2020 Apr;8(4):e19 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). World Health Organization. 2020 Feb 28.   URL: https:/​/www.​who.int/​docs/​default-source/​coronaviruse/​who-chinajoint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.​pdf [accessed 2020-06-21]
  8. Fuster V. The Stethoscope's Prognosis: Very Much Alive and Very Necessary. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016 Mar 08;67(9):1118-1119 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Zhu J, Tan Y, Huang B, Zhu Y, Gao X. Don't throw the stethoscope away!. Eur Heart J 2021 Jan 01;42(1):10-12 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Vasudevan RS, Horiuchi Y, Torriani FJ, Cotter B, Maisel SM, Dadwal SS, et al. Persistent Value of the Stethoscope in the Age of COVID-19. Am J Med 2020 Oct;133(10):1143-1150 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Knecht VR, McGinniss JE, Shankar HM, Clarke EL, Kelly BJ, Imai I, et al. Molecular analysis of bacterial contamination on stethoscopes in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018 Dec 18:1-7 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Rehman R, Ahmed K, Shaikh S. Stethoscope as a Vector for Nosocomial Bacterial Infections. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2019 Jun;29(6):592. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Jenkins IH, Monash B, Wu J, Amin A. The third hand: low rates of stethoscope hygiene on general medical services. J Hosp Med 2015 Jul;10(7):457-458. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Buonsenso D, Pata D, Chiaretti A. COVID-19 outbreak: less stethoscope, more ultrasound. Lancet Respir Med 2020 May;8(5):e27 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Personal protective equipment for Ebola. World Health Organization.   URL: https://www.who.int/medical_devices/meddev_ppe/en/ [accessed 2020-06-21]
  16. Copetti R. Is lung ultrasound the stethoscope of the new millennium? Definitely yes!. Acta Med Acad 2016 May;45(1):80-81 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Kalinauskienė E, Razvadauskas H, Morse DJ, Maxey GE, Naudžiūnas A. A Comparison of Electronic and Traditional Stethoscopes in the Heart Auscultation of Obese Patients. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019 Apr 05;55(4) [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Scott D. Coronavirus is exposing all of the weaknesses in the US health system. Vox. 2020 Mar 16.   URL: https:/​/www.​vox.com/​policy-and-politics/​2020/​3/​16/​21173766/​coronavirus-covid-19-us-cases-health-care-system [accessed 2020-06-22]
  19. Cohn J. The Coronavirus Outbreak Is About To Put Hospital Capacity To A Severe Test. Huffington Post.   URL: https:/​/www.​huffpost.com/​entry/​coronavirus-outbreakhospital-icu-masks-shortages_n_5e6521f9c5b6670e72f9b902 [accessed 2020-06-22]
  20. United States Resource Availability for COVID-19. Society of Critical Care Medicine.   URL: https://sccm.org/Blog/March-2020/United-States-Resource-Availability-for-COVID-19 [accessed 2020-06-22]
  21. DePillis L, Song L. In Desperation, New York State Pays Up to 15 Times the Normal Prices for Medical Equipment. ProPublica. 2020 Apr 02.   URL: https:/​/www.​propublica.org/​article/​in-desperation-new-york-state-pays-up-to-15-times-the-normal-price-for-medical-equipment
  22. Berklan JM. Analysis: PPE costs increase over 1,000% during COVID-19 crisis. McKnight's. 2020 Apr 09.   URL: https:/​/www.​mcknights.com/​news/​analysis-ppe-costs-increase-over-1000-during-covid-19-crisis/​#:~:text=Analysis%3A%20PPE%20costs%20increase%20over%201%2C000%25%20during%20COVID%2D19%20crisis,-James%20M.​&text=Skilled%20nursing%20facilities%20and%20assisted,its%20rampage%20in%20the%20U.​S [accessed 2020-06-22]
  23. Behere S, Baffa JM, Penfil S, Slamon N. Real-World Evaluation of the Eko Electronic Teleauscultation System. Pediatr Cardiol 2019 Jan;40(1):154-160. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Kang S, Joe B, Yoon Y, Cho G, Shin I, Suh J. Cardiac Auscultation Using Smartphones: Pilot Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 Feb 28;6(2):e49 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Upton E. Ten millionth Raspberry Pi, and a new kit. Raspberry Pi Blog. 2016 Sep 08.   URL: https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/ten-millionth-raspberry-pi-new-kit/ [accessed 2020-06-23]
  26. Setup. Raspberry Pi.   URL: https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/setup/ [accessed 2020-05-16]
  27. Van Rossum G, Drake F. Python 3 Reference Manual. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace; 2009.
  28. Python Package Index.   URL: http://pypi.org [accessed 2020-05-16]
  29. Pham H. PyAudio 0.2.11. Python Package Index. 2006.   URL: https://pypi.org/project/PyAudio/ [accessed 2020-05-15]
  30. Audio Spectrum Analyzer in Python. GitHub.   URL: https://github.com/markjay4k/Audio-Spectrum-Analyzer-in-Python [accessed 2020-05-16]
  31. Graphical User Interfaces with Tk. Python.org.   URL: https://docs.python.org/3/library/tk.html [accessed 2020-05-15]
  32. Oliphant TE. A guide to NumPy. US: Trelgol Publishing; 2006.
  33. PyInstaller.   URL: http://www.pyinstaller.org/ [accessed 2020-05-16]
  34. Auscul Pi Console. GitHub.   URL: http://www.github.com/YangChuan80/AusculPi-Console [accessed 2020-05-31]
  35. RealVNC.   URL: https://www.realvnc.com/en/ [accessed 2020-05-16]
  36. PuTTY.   URL: https://putty.org/ [accessed 2020-05-16]
  37. Sprague HB. History and Present Status of Phonocardiography. IRE Trans. Med. Electron 1957 Dec;PGME-9:2-3. [CrossRef]
  38. Auscul Pi Console Sound Parser. GitHub.   URL: https://github.com/YangChuan80/AusculPi-Console/blob/master/SoundParser.ipynb [accessed 2020-06-05]
  39. Auscul Pi Console Waveform Extraction. GitHub.   URL: https://github.com/YangChuan80/AusculPi-Console/blob/master/WaveformExtraction-yc.ipynb [accessed 2020-08-17]
  40. Chen P, Cross N. IoT in Radiology: Using Raspberry Pi to Automatically Log Telephone Calls in the Reading Room. J Digit Imaging 2018 Jun;31(3):371-378 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  41. Parra S, Carranza E, Coole J, Hunt B, Smith C, Keahey P, et al. Development of Low-Cost Point-of-Care Technologies for Cervical Cancer Prevention Based on a Single-Board Computer. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 2020;8:4300210 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  42. Aidukas T, Eckert R, Harvey AR, Waller L, Konda PC. Low-cost, sub-micron resolution, wide-field computational microscopy using opensource hardware. Sci Rep 2019 May 15;9(1):7457 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  43. DeAngelis M. Raspberry Pi will power ventilators for COVID-19 patients. Engadget. 2020 Apr 13.   URL: https://www.engadget.com/raspberry-pi-ventilators-covid-19-163729140.html [accessed 2020-06-21]
  44. Adly A, Adly A, Adly M. Approaches Based on Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Intelligent Things to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2020 Aug 10;22(8):e19104 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  45. Farooq A, Laato S, Islam AKMN. Impact of Online Information on Self-Isolation Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res 2020 May 06;22(5):e19128 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]


ECG: electrocardiogram
GUI: graphical user interface
ICS: intercostal space
ICU: intensive care unit
PCG: phonocardiogram


Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 22.07.20; peer-reviewed by E van der Velde, Z Reis; comments to author 15.08.20; revised version received 28.12.20; accepted 12.01.21; published 19.01.21

Copyright

©Chuan Yang, Wei Zhang, Zhixuan Pang, Jing Zhang, Deling Zou, Xinzhong Zhang, Sicong Guo, Jiye Wan, Ke Wang, Wenyue Pang. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 19.01.2021.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.