Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Nov 8, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 8, 2019 - Jan 3, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note “no longer under consideration” will appear above).
Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a “Peer-Review Me” button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed “version of record” (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
A review and comparison of third-party software applications for electronic health records
Third-party electronic health record (EHR) apps are available to allow healthcare organizations to extend the capabilities and features of their EHR. Given the widespread utilization of EHRs, and the emergence of third-party apps in EHR marketplaces, it has become necessary to conduct a systematic review and analysis of apps in EHR app marketplaces.
The goal of this review is to organize, categorize, and characterize availability of third-party apps in EHR marketplaces.
Two informaticists (JR & BW) used grounded theory principles to review and categorize EHR apps listed in top EHR vendors’ public-facing marketplaces.
We categorized a total of 471 EHR apps into a taxonomy consisting of 3 primary categories, 15 secondary categories, and 55 tertiary categories. The three primary categories were administrative (203 apps; 43.1%), provider support (159 apps; 33.8%), and patient care (109 apps; 23.1%). Within administrative apps, we split the apps into four secondary categories: front office (77 apps), financial (53 apps), office administration (49 apps), and office device integration (17 apps). Within the provider support primary classification, we split the apps into eight secondary categories: documentation (34 apps), records management (27 apps), care coordination (23 apps), population health (18 apps), EHR efficiency (16 apps), ordering & prescribing (15 apps), medical device integration (13 apps) and specialty EHR (12 apps). Within the patient care primary classification, we split the apps into three secondary categories: patient engagement (50 apps), clinical decision support (40 apps), and remote care (18 apps). Total app counts varied substantially across EHR vendors. Overall distribution of apps across primary categories were relatively similar with a few exceptions.
We characterized and organized a diverse and rich set of third-party EHR apps. This work provides an important reference for developers, researchers, and EHR customers to more easily search, review, and compare apps in EHR app stores.
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.