TY  - JOUR
AU  - Li, Angie
AU  - Mullin, Sarah
AU  - Elkin, Peter L
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/2/14
TI  - Improving Prediction of Survival for Extremely Premature Infants Born at 23 to 29 Weeks Gestational Age in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Development and Evaluation of Machine Learning Models
JO  - JMIR Med Inform
SP  - e42271
VL  - 12
KW  - reproductive informatics
KW  - pregnancy complications
KW  - premature birth
KW  - neonatal mortality
KW  - machine learning
KW  - clinical decision support
KW  - preterm
KW  - pediatrics
KW  - intensive care unit outcome
KW  - health care outcome
KW  - survival prediction
KW  - maternal health
KW  - decision tree model
KW  - socioeconomic
AB  - Background: Infants born at extremely preterm gestational ages are typically admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after initial resuscitation. The subsequent hospital course can be highly variable, and despite counseling aided by available risk calculators, there are significant challenges with shared decision-making regarding life support and transition to end-of-life care. Improving predictive models can help providers and families navigate these unique challenges. Objective: Machine learning methods have previously demonstrated added predictive value for determining intensive care unit outcomes, and their use allows consideration of a greater number of factors that potentially influence newborn outcomes, such as maternal characteristics. Machine learning–based models were analyzed for their ability to predict the survival of extremely preterm neonates at initial admission. Methods: Maternal and newborn information was extracted from the health records of infants born between 23 and 29 weeks of gestation in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) critical care database. Applicable machine learning models predicting survival during the initial NICU admission were developed and compared. The same type of model was also examined using only features that would be available prepartum for the purpose of survival prediction prior to an anticipated preterm birth. Features most correlated with the predicted outcome were determined when possible for each model. Results: Of included patients, 37 of 459 (8.1%) expired. The resulting random forest model showed higher predictive performance than the frequently used Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology With Perinatal Extension II (SNAPPE-II) NICU model when considering extremely preterm infants of very low birth weight. Several other machine learning models were found to have good performance but did not show a statistically significant difference from previously available models in this study. Feature importance varied by model, and those of greater importance included gestational age; birth weight; initial oxygenation level; elements of the APGAR (appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration) score; and amount of blood pressure support. Important prepartum features also included maternal age, steroid administration, and the presence of pregnancy complications. Conclusions: Machine learning methods have the potential to provide robust prediction of survival in the context of extremely preterm births and allow for consideration of additional factors such as maternal clinical and socioeconomic information. Evaluation of larger, more diverse data sets may provide additional clarity on comparative performance. 
SN  - 2291-9694
UR  - https://medinform.jmir.org/2024/1/e42271
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/42271
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38354033
DO  - 10.2196/42271
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/42271
ER  -